Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: 24STCV30681, Date: 2025-01-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV30681 Hearing Date: January 24, 2025 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. WINIFRED
GREEN, and DOES 1 TO 10, inclusive,
Defendants. |
|
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO TRANSFER Date: January 24, 2025 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 |
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Winifred Green (“Defendant”)
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff
Vokshori Law Group, APLC (“Plaintiff”)
The Court has considered the moving,
opposition and reply papers.
BACKGROUND
This is a breach of contract action
arising from an attorney-client relationship. On November 20, 2024, Plaintiff
filed the operative complaint (“Complaint”) alleging a cause of action for
breach of contract based on unpaid legal fees.
On December 23, 2024, Defendant
filed the instant motion to transfer (the “Motion”). On January 8, 2025,
Plaintiff filed an opposition (the “Opposition”). On January 15, 2025,
Defendant filed a reply (the “Reply”).
DISCUSSION
“The court may, on motion, change
the place of trial in the following cases: (a) When the court designated in the
complaint is not the proper court.” (Code Civil Procedure (“CCP”), § 397, subd.
(a).)
A court is proper if it is in the county
in which the defendant resides, in which the plaintiff was injured, or in which
the parties’ contract was executed. (CCP, §§ 395, subd. (a), 395, subd. (b).)
If the plaintiff files an action with an improper court, that court must
transfer the action to a proper court, either upon the defendant’s motion or on
its own motion. (CCP, §§ 396a, subd. (b), 396b.) Where venue is improper, the
defendant bears the burden of bringing this defect to the court’s attention. (Mission
Imps., Inc. v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929.)
Defendant argues that the proper
venue lies in San Diego County because she resides in San Diego County, she executed
the legal services agreement (the “Agreement”) in San Diego County, and the underlying
litigation was filed in San Diego County. (Mot. pp. 6:27-7:9.)
In the Opposition, Plaintiff asserts
that venue is proper in Los Angeles County because Plaintiff performed the
legal services from its principal place of business in Los Angeles and the
Agreement requires only that fee disputes are to be tried before a California
Superior Court judge but does not limit venue to San Diego County. (Opp. pp. 3:24-4:10.)
The Court finds in favor of
Defendant. Defendant resides in and executed the Agreement in San Diego County.
(Green Decl. ¶¶ 9, 13; see also CCP § 395 subd. (a).) This action arises
out of legal representation that occurred in San Diego Superior Court related
to real property located in San Diego County. (Green Decl. ¶ 14; see also
CCP § 395 subd. (a).) The Agreement between the parties is silent as to whether
fee disputes are to be tried in Los Angeles or San Diego. (Compl. Ex. A.) Thus,
Defendant has met her burden to show that venue is proper in San Diego County.
Request
for Sanctions
“In its discretion, the court may
order the payment to the prevailing party of reasonable expenses and attorneys'
fees incurred in making or resisting the motion to transfer whether or not that
party is otherwise entitled to recover his or her costs of action.” (CCP, §
396b subd. (b).)
Both parties argue that they are
entitled to monetary sanctions pursuant to this statute. (Mot. pp. 7:17-8:3;
Opp. pp. 4:19-5:5.) The Court exercises its statutory discretion to find that
no sanctions should be awarded in favor of either party. Defendant’s motion for change of venue was
in good faith, as was Plaintiff’s opposition.
The Motion to Transfer Venue is
GRANTED. The requests for sanctions are DENIED.
Moving
Party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org as directed
by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion will be placed off
calendar.
Dated this 24th day of January 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Holly J.
Fujie Judge of the
Superior Court |