Judge: Holly J. Fujie, Case: BC622959, Date: 2022-12-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC622959 Hearing Date: December 28, 2022 Dept: 56
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
MOVING
PARTY: Plaintiff
The
Court has considered the moving papers.
No opposition papers were filed.
Any opposition papers were required to have been filed and served at
least nine court days before the hearing under California Code of Civil
Procedure (“CCP”) section 1005, subdivision (b).
BACKGROUND
On June 6. 2016, Plaintiff filed a complaint (the
“Complaint”) alleging subrogation. On
October 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to vacate dismissal and enter
judgment against Defendant Ricardo Jose Cordon (“Defendant”) (the
“Motion”).
DISCUSSION
If
parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties
outside the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of
the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant
to the terms of the settlement. (CCP §
664.6.) If requested by the parties, the
court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce settlement until
performance in full of the terms of the settlement. (Id.)
On
March 21, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a settlement agreement and
stipulation for dismissal with reservation to vacate and enter judgment upon
breach (the “Agreement”) which provides that judgment would not be entered
against Defendant if Defendant made monthly settlement payments to Plaintiff. (Declaration of Harlan M. Reese (“Reese
Decl.”) ¶ 2, Exhibit A.) On April 11,
2017, the Court dismissed the Complaint but retained jurisdiction pursuant to
CCP section 664.6. (Reese Decl. ¶
3.) Since that time, Defendant has made
payments in the total amount of $12,470 but has defaulted on his monthly
payments. (Reese Decl. ¶ 4.) After Defendant’s default, Plaintiff made
several attempts to contact Defendant regarding the missed payments. (See Reese Decl. ¶ 5, Exhibit B.) In addition, Plaintiff incurred $60 in filing
fees in connection to the Motion. (See
Reese Decl. ¶ 7.)
As
it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
(Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) The dismissal is to be vacated and judgment
in the amount of $5,090, which represents $17,500 minus Defendant’s payments of
$12,470 and plus $60 in fees is to be entered against Defendant.
Moving
party is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
In consideration of the current COVID-19 pandemic
situation, the Court¿strongly¿encourages that appearances on all
proceedings, including this one, be made by LACourtConnect if the
parties do not submit on the tentative.¿¿If you instead intend to make an
appearance in person at Court on this matter, you must send an email by 2 p.m.
on the last Court day before the scheduled date of the hearing to¿SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org¿stating your intention to appear in person.¿ The Court will then
inform you by close of business that day of the time your hearing will be held.
The time set for the hearing may be at any time during that scheduled hearing
day, or it may be necessary to schedule the hearing for another date if the
Court is unable to accommodate all personal appearances set on that date.¿ This
rule is necessary to ensure that adequate precautions can be taken for proper
social distancing.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMC_DEPT56@lacourt.org
as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at
www.lacourt.org. If the department does
not receive an email and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion
will be placed off calendar.
Dated this 28th day of December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Holly J. Fujie Judge
of the Superior Court |