Judge: Joel L. Lofton, Case: 19GDCV01571, Date: 2023-08-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19GDCV01571 Hearing Date: August 3, 2023 Dept: X
Tentative Ruling
Judge Joel L. Lofton,
Department X
HEARING DATE: August 3, 2023 TRIAL DATE: October 17, 2023
CASE: WANYU LUO, an
individual; DENONG TEA, INC., a California corporation, v. CHD DESIGN GROUPS,
INC., a California corporation doing business as CHD INTERNATIONAL; ERIC LIN,
an individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive.
CASE NO.: 19GDCV01571
![]()
MOTION
TO BIFURCATE
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Cross-Complainants CHD Design
Groups, Inc. and Eric Lin
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiffs
Wanyu Luo and Denong Tea, Inc.
SERVICE: Filed July 5, 2023
OPPOSITION: Filed July 21, 2023
REPLY: Filed July 26, 2023
RELIEF
REQUESTED
Defendants move to bifurcate the
issue of the limitations of liability clause relevant to Plaintiffs’ breach of
contract claim.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of Plaintiffs Wanyu Luo
and Denong Tea, Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) claims against Defendants CHD Design
Groups, Inc. and Eric Lin (“Defendants”) for architectural services for a
project located at 482 South Arroyo Parkway, Unit 100, Pasadena, California
91105. Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on May 24, 2021, alleging
four causes of action for (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (3) unjust enrichment, and (4) fraud.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendants’
motion to bifurcate is DENIED without prejudice.
DISCUSSION
Defendants
move to bifurcate the issue of the applicability of the limitations of
liability clause in the contract between the parties.
Code
of Civil Procedure section 598, in relevant part, provides: “The court may, when
the convenience of witnesses, the ends of justice, or the economy and
efficiency of handling the litigation would be promoted thereby, on motion of a
party, after notice and hearing, make an order, no later than the close of
pretrial conference in cases in which such pretrial conference is to be held,
or, in other cases, no later than 30 days before the trial date, that the trial
of any issue or any part thereof shall precede the trial of any other issue or
any part thereof in the case, except for special defenses which may be tried
first pursuant to Sections 597 and 597.5. The court, on its own motion, may
make such an order at any time. Where trial of the issue of liability as to all
causes of action precedes the trial of other issues or parts thereof, and the
decision of the court, or the verdict of the jury upon such issue so tried is
in favor of any party on whom liability is sought to be imposed, judgment in
favor of such party shall thereupon be entered and no trial of other issues in
the action as against such party shall be had unless such judgment shall be
reversed upon appeal or otherwise set aside or vacated.”
Defendants
seek to have the applicability of the limitations of liability clause heard
first at trial for this case. At the current juncture, the court does not find
that the economy and efficiency of handling the litigation would be promoted by
bifurcating the present issue. Defendants’ motion is denied without prejudice.
Defendant may raise this issue again at the final status conference.
CONCLUSION
Defendants’
motion to bifurcate is DENIED without prejudice.
Moving
party to give notice.
Dated: August 3, 2023 ___________________________________
Joel
L. Lofton
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court
indicating their
intention to submit.
Parties intending to appear are strongly encouraged to appear remotely. alhdeptx@lacourt.org