Judge: Joel L. Lofton, Case: 22AHCV00574, Date: 2022-12-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22AHCV00574 Hearing Date: December 5, 2022 Dept: X
Tentative Ruling
Judge Joel L. Lofton,
Department X
HEARING DATE: December
5, 2022 TRIAL DATE: No date set.
CASE: MIMI LIANG v.
EMERALD TAY, M.D.
CASE NO.: 22AHCV00574
![]()
MOTION
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Defendant Emerald Tay, M.D.
RESPONDING PARTY: No
response filed.
SERVICE: Filed November 3, 2022
RELIEF
REQUESTED
Defendant moves to compel a response to form interrogatories, special
interrogatories, and requests for the production of documents.
Defendant also moves for
an order deeming the truth of the matters specified in her requests for
admissions admitted.
Defendant also requests
monetary sanctions totaling $1,490.00 for each motion.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of Plaintiff Mimi Liang’s
(“Plaintiff”) personal injury claim against Defendant Emerald Tay, M.D.
(“Defendant”). Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on November 22, 2022.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendant’s motion to compel discovery responses is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to respond to Defendant’s form
interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for the production of
documents.
Defendant’s motion to deem admitted the truth of the
matters specified in her requests for admissions is GRANTED.
Defendant’s
request for sanctions is GRANTED in the amount of $390.00.
LEGAL STANDARD
If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely
response, the party propounding the interrogatories may move for an order
compelling a response to the interrogatories. (Code Civ. Proc. section
2030.290, subd. (b).) The same applies to a party that fails to respond to a
request for document production. (Code Civ. Proc. section 2031.300, subd. (b).)
Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280, subdivision (b), provides that
if a party fails to respond to a request for admission, “[t]he requesting party
may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of
any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted”.
DISCUSSION
On September 6, 2022, Defendant propounded
discovery requests including form
interrogatories, special interrogatories, requests for the production of
documents, and requests for admissions on Plaintiff. (James Decl. ¶ 3.) As of November 3, 2022, Defendant had
received no discovery responses from Plaintiff. (Id. ¶ 5.)
Defendant has served Plaintiff with discovery requests,
but Plaintiff has failed to provide any response. Defendant’s motion to compel
discovery responses to her form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and
requests for the production of documents is granted.
Further, Defendant’s motion to deem the truth of the
matters contained in her requests for admission admitted is granted.
Sanctions
Defendant also requests sanctions pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure sections 2030.290, subdivision (c), 2031.300, and 2033.280,
subdivision (c). The first two sections state a court “shall impose a monetary
sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party,
person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel”
discovery responses. However, Plaintiff has not made or opposed the present
motion.
Defendant is
entitled to sanctions, however, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
2033.280, subdivision (c).) Defendant’s counsel charges $220.00 per hour for an
estimated 1.5 hours of work for the present motion. (James Decl. ¶ 7.)
Plaintiff is ordered to pay monetary sanctions totaling
$390.00, for 1.5 hours worked plus a $60 filing fee.
CONCLUSION
Defendant’s motion to compel discovery responses is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to respond to Defendant’s form
interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for the production of
documents with 10 days of notice of this ruling.
Defendant’s motion to deem admitted the truth of the
matters specified in her requests for admissions is GRANTED.
Defendant’s
request for sanctions is GRANTED in the amount of $390.00.
Moving
party to give notice.
Dated: December 5,
2022 ___________________________________
Joel
L. Lofton
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the court indicating their
intention to submit.
Parties intending to appear are strongly encouraged to appear remotely. alhdeptx@lacourt.org