Judge: Joel L. Lofton, Case: 23AHCV00655, Date: 2023-06-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23AHCV00655 Hearing Date: August 17, 2023 Dept: X
Tentative Ruling
Judge Joel L. Lofton,
Department X
HEARING DATE: August 17, 2023 TRIAL DATE: No date set.
CASE: NICOLE JOHNSON, an
individual, v. LASERAWAY MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a California corporation;
LASERAWAY, LLC, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive.
CASE NO.: 23AHCV00655
![]()
MOTION
TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Defendants Laseraway Medical Group,
Inc. and Laseraway, LLC (“Defendants”)
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Nicole Johnson
SERVICE: Filed July 10, 2023
OPPOSITION: Notice of non-opposition filed August 10,
2023
RELIEF
REQUESTED
Defendants move to compel
Plaintiff to submit this claim to binding arbitration.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of Plaintiff Nicole
Johnson’s claim that on January 4, 2023, she suffered burns and injuries as a
result of Defendants’ negligent performance of a laser hair removal procedure.
Plaintiff filed this complaint March 24, 2023, alleging eight causes of action
for (1) general negligence, (2) fraud, (3) breach of contract, (4) battery, (5)
unjust enrichment, (6) Consumer Legal
Remedies Act violation, (7) Unfair Competition Law violation, and (8) False Advertising
Law violation.
TENTATIVE RULING
Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.
This
case is ordered stay pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4.
LEGAL STANDARD
“California
and federal law both favor enforcement of valid arbitration agreements.” (Aanderud
v. Superior Court (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 880, 889.) “A party who files
a motion to compel arbitration ‘bears the burden of proving the existence of a
valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party
opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the
evidence any fact necessary to its defense.’’ (Cisnero Alverez v. Altamed
Health Services Corporation (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 572, 580.)
DISCUSSION
Defendants
move to compel Plaintiff to submit this claim to binding arbitration.
Defendants assert that Plaintiff consented to the arbitration agreement on
February 25, 2023. (Heckmann Decl. ¶ 8, Exhibit B.)
On August 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed notice that she was not opposing
Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration.
Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is granted.
CONCLUSION
Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.
This
case is ordered stayed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4.
Case Management
Conference set on September 6, 2023 is taken off calendar and a Post
Arbitration Status hearing on June 26, 2024 at 8:30am
Moving
Party to give notice.
Dated: August 17, 2023 ___________________________________
Joel
L. Lofton
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court
indicating their
intention to submit.
Parties intending to appear are strongly encouraged to appear remotely. alhdeptx@lacourt.org