Judge: Joel L. Lofton, Case: 23AHCV00850, Date: 2023-10-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23AHCV00850 Hearing Date: October 9, 2023 Dept: X
Tentative Ruling
Judge Joel L. Lofton,
Department X
HEARING DATE: October 9, 2023 TRIAL DATE: No date set.
CASE: SHUNDE ROOFING
INC. and YUAN ZHANG, an individual, v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICAN, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive.
CASE NO.: 23AHCV00850
![]()
MOTION
TO COMPEL DEPOSITION
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiffs Shunde Roofing Inc. and
Yuan Zhang
RESPONDING PARTY: No
response filed.
SERVICE: Filed August 11, 2023
RELIEF
REQUESTED
Plaintiffs move for an order
compelling the deposition of Defendant’s person most knowledgeable.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of Plaintiffs Shunde
Roofing Inc. and Yuan Zhang’s (“Plaintiffs”) lemon law claim for a 2022 BMW X7,
Vehicle Identification Number 5UXCW2C05N9M18722 (“Subject
Vehicle”). Plaintiffs filed their complaint on April 17, 2023, alleging three
causes of action for (1) violation of Song-Beverly Act – Breach of Express
Warranty, (2) violation of Song-Beverly – Breach of Implied Warranty, and (3)
violation of the Song-Beverly Act section 1793.2(b).
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition testimony of
Defendant’s person most knowledge is GRANTED.
Defendant
is ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiff for a mutually agreeable date for
the deposition.
LEGAL STANDARD
Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.450, subdivision (a), provides: “If, after service
of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing
agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that
is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection
under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it,
or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information,
or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the
notice may move for an order compelling the deponent’s attendance and
testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically
stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.”
Code of
Civil Procedure section 2025.450 subdivision (b) requires that any motion under
subdivision (a) set forth specific facts showing good cause and a meet and
confer declaration or, when a deponent fails to attend the deposition, a
declaration stating the moving party contacted the deponent to inquire about
the nonappearance.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiffs
provide that they noticed the deposition of Defendant’s person most knowledge
on June 14, 2023, with a deposition date of June 30, 2023. (Daghighian Decl.
¶ 8, Exhibit B.) Plaintiffs provide that Defendant
did not serve any objections or other responses and did not produce any
deponent or documents. (Id. ¶ 14.) Plaintiffs provide that they sent two
meet and confer letters on July 9, 2023, and July 17, 2023, that Defendant did
not respond to. (Id. ¶¶ 15-16.)
Plaintiffs
have served a notice of deposition that Defendant neither objected to nor
complied with. Defendant has also not opposed the present motion. Plaintiffs’
motion to compel the deposition testimony of Defendant’s person most knowledge
is granted.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition testimony of
Defendant’s person most knowledge is GRANTED.
Defendant
is ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiff for a mutually agreeable date for
the deposition.
Dated: October 9,
2023 ___________________________________
Joel
L. Lofton
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the court indicating their
intention to submit.
Parties intending to appear are strongly encouraged to appear remotely. alhdeptx@lacourt.org