Judge: John J. Kralik, Case: 23BBCV01487, Date: 2024-06-07 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23BBCV01487    Hearing Date: June 7, 2024    Dept: NCB

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

North Central District

Department B

 

 

mahnaz sadanian, et al.,

 

                        Plaintiffs,

            v.

burbank emergency medical group, et al.,

 

                        Defendants.

 

  Case No.: 23BBCV01487

 

  Hearing Date:  June 7, 2024

 

 [TENTATIVE] order RE:

demurrer

 

BACKGROUND

A.    Allegations

Plaintiff Mahnaz Sadanian (“Sadanian”) alleges that on April 18, 2022, she was admitted to the Emergency Department at Providence St. Joseph Medical Center where she was seen by Defendant Dr. Roger C. Lai and staff.  Sadanian alleges that Dr. Lai is employed by Defendant Burbank Emergency Medical Group (“Burbank EMG”).  Sadanian alleges that Dr. Lai and his staff performed blood tests and other tests.  She alleges, thereafter, that a female nurse/staff turned her over and held her while Dr. Lai penetrated her rectum, causing Sadanian to experience pain and to scream.  Sadanian alleges that she did not consent to being penetrated in the rectum and that the pain lasted for over 2 days.  She alleges that she was discharged from the emergency department. 

Plaintiff and counsel Isaac Toveg (“Toveg”) alleges that he is the husband of Sadanian and that as a result of Sadanian’s injuries, she has been unable to perform the necessary duties as a wife, such that Toveg has suffered a loss of consortium. 

The first amended complaint (“FAC”), filed on March 6, 2024, alleges causes of action for: (1) professional negligence by Sadanian against Dr. Lai; (2) intentional tort by Sadanian against Defendants; and (3) loss of consortium by Toveg against Dr. Lai. 

B.     Demurrer on Calendar

On April 9, 2024, Dr. Lai and Burbank EMG filed a demurrer to the complaint.

On May 23, 2024, Plaintiff Sadanian filed an opposition brief. 

On May 31, 2024, Defendants filed a reply brief.

DISCUSSION

            Defendants demur to the 1st cause of action for professional negligence and the 2nd cause of action for intentional tort. 

A.    1st cause of action

To establish a medical malpractice claim, the plaintiff must establish: “(1) the duty of the professional to use such skill, prudence, and diligence as other members of his profession commonly possess and exercise; (2) breach of that duty; (3) a proximate causal connection between the negligence conduct and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage resulting from the professional’s negligence.”  (Borrayo v. Avery (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 304, 310.) 

The allegations of the 1st cause of action are summarized above in the “Background” section of this order.  (See FAC at PLD-PI-001(2).)  Defendants argue that Sadanian has not alleged the basic elements of duty, breach, and causation for the injury she suffered as a result of a rectum examination. 

Indeed, the allegations of the FAC are sparse.  Sadanian has not alleged what duty Dr. Lai owed to Sadanian in connection with her presentation at the Emergency Department, how Dr. Lai breached that duty, and thereby caused her damages.  As such, the demurrer to the 1st cause of action is sustained with leave to amend.

B.     2nd cause of action

In the 2nd cause of action, Sadanian alleges that she was admitted to the Emergency Department and seen by Dr. Lai and his staff.  She alleges that while she was in bed by herself, Dr. Lai and a female nurse came in and did not disclose or ask permission from Sadanian if they could examine her private parts.  She alleges that Dr. Lai and the female staff turned Sadanian over and penetrated her rectum.  (FAC at PLD-PI-001(3).) 

The allegations to the intentional tort cause of action are similarly lacking.  As currently alleged, the cause of action is duplicative of the 1st cause of action.  Sadanian has not alleged facts showing how this cause of action is different than the professional negligence cause of action, or how Defendants acted intentionally to cause Sadanian injury. 

As such, the demurrer to the 2nd cause of action is sustained with leave to amend.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Defendants Roger C. Lai, M.D. and Burbank Emergency Medical Group, Inc.’s demurrer to the FAC is sustained with 20 days leave to amend as to the 1st and 2nd causes of action.

Defendants shall give notice of this order. 

 

DATED: June 7, 2024                                                                        ___________________________

                                                                                          John Kralik

                                                                                          Judge of the Superior Court