Judge: John J. Kralik, Case: EC062581, Date: 2024-02-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: EC062581    Hearing Date: February 2, 2024    Dept: NCB

 

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

North Central District

Department B

 

 

catherine gilmour smith,

                        Plaintiff,

            v.

 

brian harrington, et al.,

                        Defendants.

 

  Case No.: EC062581

 

  Hearing Date:  February 2, 2024

 

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motion fOR an order determining claim of exemption

 

BACKGROUND

A.    Allegations and Relevant Background

            In this action Plaintiff Catherine Gilmour Smith (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendant Brian Harrington (“Harrington”) is a “con man” who steals funds from friends and associates and does not pay them back.  Plaintiff alleges she believed that Harrington was a rich, knowledgeable partner in Defendant Madison Financial, based on his representations, when in fact he was an unlicensed salesperson.  Based on her belief in his abilities, Plaintiff accepted Harrington’s offer to invest her savings of approximately $400,000 to $500,000 through Madison financial.  However, Harrington did not make the investments and rather were used by Harrington, Defendant Claudia Fisher, and Defendant Gary Ahlfeldt. 

On February 4, 2016, Plaintiff filed the fourth amended complaint (“4AC”) against Defendants for various causes of action for: (1) RICO violations; (2) fraud and deceit; (3) conspiracy; (4) common count; (5) common count; (6) assault and battery; (7) breach of contract; (8) unfair business practice; (9) fraud and deceit; and (10) conspiracy.  At the time trial commenced, the remaining causes of action were the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th causes of action.   

B.     Relevant Background

            Trial on the matter was held in May 2017, and the Court bifurcated trial on punitive damages in October 2017.  In the Court’s Final Statement of Decision on Liability only, the Court awarded Plaintiff $1,000,000.00 in compensatory damages.  In the Court’s Final Decision on the Punitive Damages issue, the Court awarded Plaintiff punitive damages in the amount of $500,000.00 against Ahlfeldt and $500,000.00 against Madison Financial. 

            On May 13, 2021, Assignee of Record Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (“Creditors”) filed a motion for an order determining claim of exemption, arguing that Gary E. Ahlfeldt’s earnings claimed as exempt were not exempt.  On June 4, 2021, the Court denied the motion for claim of exemption as it was unclear as to if or how much money was being held by the sheriff. 

            On March 24, 2022, Creditors filed a Notice of Hearing on Claim of Exemption as to Judgment Debtor Fidelity Investments account with a hearing date of April 22, 2022.  Creditors opposed the claim of exemption, arguing that Ahlfeldt provided insufficient proof to support funds levied from Fidelity was exempt.  On March 28, 2022, Creditors filed a motion for an order determining claim of exemption as to Fidelity and TD Ameritrade accounts set for April 22, 2022.  On April 4, 2022, the Sheriff filed 2 Memos to the Court Clerk stating that it was holding: (1) $35,816.41 and other: “FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, MORE LVEY [sic] & WAGE GARNISHMEN [sic]”; and (2) $35,816.41 and other “TD AMERITRADEW [sic], INC. MORE LEVY & WAGE GARNISHM [sic].”  On April 11 and 12, 2022, Ahlfeldt filed oppositions briefs and requests for judicial notice.  On April 22, 2022, the matter came for hearing and the Court took the matter under submission.  On May 18, 2022, the Court denied Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption and the levying officer was directed to release any and all levied funds being held to Creditors for payment on the judgment.  The Court signed the Order on Claim of Exemption, finding that: (1) all the funds of Ahlfeldt’s TD Ameritrade SEP IRA retirement account will be necessary to provide support of Ahlfeldt when he retires, taking into account all resources that are likely to be available for his support when he retires and (2) Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption is granted and the levying officer is directed to release to Ahlfeldt all levied funds from Ahlfeldt’s TD Ameritrade SEP IRA retirement account. 

C.    Motion on Calendar

            On November 21, 2023, Creditors filed a notice of hearing on claim of exemption, seeking a determination on the claim of exemption of Ahlfeldt.  The hearing was initially set for January 5, 2024.  Creditors filed its motion papers and its opposition to Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption on November 21, 2023. 

On December 12, 2023, the Court on its own motion continued the hearing to February 2, 2024. 

On January 22, 2024, Ahlfeldt filed an opposition to the motion for order denying the claim of exemption. 

DISCUSSION

            Creditors moves for an order determining the claim of exemption claimed by Ahlfeldt.  Creditors argues that after hearing evidence relating to Ahlfeldt’s income, it was found that on average, Ahlfeldt earned approximately $225,000 per year, which Ahlfeldt did not contest.  On October 3, 203, Creditors sent to the Orange County Sheriff’s office its bank levy instructing the OC Sheriff to execute on all accounts held in the name of Ahlfeldt being held at Pacific Premier Bank.  (Frisccher Decl., ¶2, Ex. 1 [bank levy instructions and writ of Execution issued by the Court on September 11, 2023].)  On November 3, 2023, Creditors received Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption from the OC Sheriff, wherein Ahlfeldt claimed that all accounts levied except for Account No. 2907 in the amount of $158.30 and Account No. 5083 in the amount of $4.21, were broker trust accounts and were exempt pursuant to Financial Code, § 17410 and CCP § 695.030.  (Id., ¶3, Ex. 2 [Claim of Exemption and financial statements from OC Sheriff].)  Creditors requests that Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption be denied in part as to the levied funds for: (1) Ahlfeldt’s compensation fee of $1,614.85; (2) the funds levied from Account No. 2907 in the amount of $158.30; and the funds levied from Account No. 5083 in the amount of $4.21, for which Ahlfeldt is not claiming an exemption.  Thus, Creditors seeks $1,777.36 to be turned over. 

            In opposition, Ahlfeldt states that he does not oppose the release to Creditors the amount of $1,614.85 from the trust account levies, nor the $158.30 and $4.21 unopposed levies, for a total of $1,777.36.  Ahlfeldt requests that the Court issue an order: (1) granting his claim of exemption as to the amount of $31,599.19 and directing those funds to be released to him and (2) granting Creditor’s motion as to $1,777.36 of the levied funds and ordering that the funds be turned over to Creditors.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

            Assignee of Record Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.’s motion for an order determining the claim of exemption claimed by Judgment Debtor Gary E. Ahlfeldt is granted.  The Court denies Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption with respect to the levied funds for: (1) Ahlfeldt’s compensation fee of $1,614.85; (2) the funds levied from Account No. 2907 in the amount of $158.30; and the funds levied from Account No. 5083 in the amount of $4.21, for which Ahlfeldt is not claiming an exemption.  As such, the Court orders that $1,777.36 be turned over to Creditors. 

            The remainder of Judgment Debtor Gary E. Ahlfeldt’s claim of exemption is granted. 

            Judgment Creditor shall submit an Order Determining Claim of Exemption ORD060 to the Court and provide notice of this order. Judgment Creditor will have to obtain a certified copy of the Order Determining Claim of Exemption ORD060 once it is signed by the court and submit said order to the Sheriff.

Note: The Court will be handling hearings remotely on February 2, 2024. If you wish to be heard in person, please inform the clerk and your matter will be continued to allow you to appear personally.

 

 

DATED: February 2, 2024                                                     ___________________________

                                                                                          John J. Kralik

                                                                                          Judge of the Superior Court