Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 19STCV25208, Date: 2022-10-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV25208 Hearing Date: October 5, 2022 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
JASON T. YU
vs. KRISTOPHER RENE
GOMEZ, et al. |
Case
No.: 19STCV25208 Hearing Date: October 5, 2022 |
Plaintiff’s
motion to strike Defendant Victor Mendiola’s answer is GRANTED.
On 7/18/2019,
Plaintiff Jason T. Yu (Plaintiff) initiated this action.
On 2/16/2022,
Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (SAC) against Kristopher Rene Gomez,
KMD Property Solutions, LLC, and Victor Mendiola, alleging: (1) fraud and
intentional misrepresentation; (2) concealment; (3) violation of the Unfair
Competition law; (4) violation of California Civil Code section 1102; (5)
breach of contract; (6) negligent misrepresentation; (7) negligence; (8)
violation of Civil Code section 2079.
Now,
Plaintiff moves to strike Defendant Victor Mendiola’s answer.
The
motion is unopposed.
Discussion
Plaintiff argues that Defendant’s
answer should be stricken because he has refused to subsequently participate in
this litigation.
“Any party, within the time
allowed to response to a pleading, may serve and file a notice of motion to
strike the whole or any part" of that pleading. (CCP 435(b). “The Court
may, upon a motion made pursuant to Section 435, or at any time in its
discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: (a) Strike out any irrelevant,
false or improper matter asserted in any pleading; (b) Strike out all or any
part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this
state, a court rule, or an order of the Court." (CCP 436.)
Here, Plaintiff has
submitted evidence that Defendant has refused to appear for his deposition after he confirmed he
would appear, has failed to take part in a mediation that was scheduled on a
mutually agreeable date, and has failed to attend multiple hearings before this
Court.” (Motion, 2: 2-4.) Moreover, Defendant failed to oppose this motion. As
such, Defendant’s failure to act since his 2/7/2020 answer was filed indicates
that he is either unwilling or unable to litigate this action.
Based
on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to strike Defendant Victor Mendiola’s
answer is granted.
It is so ordered.
Dated: October
, 2022
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.