Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 19STCV34609, Date: 2023-02-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV34609 Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
ESTATE OF TOK HUI TILL, et al. vs. LOS ANGELES CENTERS FOR ALCOHOL AND
DRUG ABUSE, INC. |
Case No.:
19STCV34609 Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 |
LACADA’s
motion to compel is GRANTED. Plaintiff is sanctioned, jointly and severally,
$700.00, to be paid within 30 days of entry of this order.
On 9/27/2020,
Plaintiffs Estate of Tok Hui Till, Sunja Ja Lam, and Jonathan Till
(collectively, Plaintiffs) initiated this action.
On 4/28/2020,
Cross-Complainant Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Inc. (LACADA)
filed a cross-complaint against Katherine Sang Eun Koo and Susan Ho
(collectively, Cross-Defendants).
Now,
LACADA moves to compel Plaintiff to provide verified responses to its Demands
for Production (DFPs). LACAD also seeks monetary sanctions.
The
motion is unopposed.
Discussion
On
2/4/2020, LACADA served Plaintiff with DFPs. On 7/6/2020, Plaintiff served
unverified responses to the demands for production. As a part of the responses,
Plaintiff agreed to produce all nonprivileged documents. (Exh. B.) By a letter
also sent on 7/6/2020, Plaintiff’s counsel informed defendant’s counsel that
plaintiff’s verifications would “follow promptly.” (Exh. C.) No documents were
produced.
By email
dated 12/15/2022, LACADA’s present counsel requested that Plaintiff’s attorney
supply the verification for the responses to demands for production no later
than 12/29/2022, and produce the requested documents. Plaintiff’s attorney
stated he would “look into whether the responses were verified.” Having heard
nothing further from Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant’s attorney followed up with
emails dated 1/4/2023, and 1/11/2023. (Exh D.) Despite Defendant’s meet and
confer efforts, no verified responses and no documents have been received.
Given
Plaintiff’s failure to oppose, the Court is without substantial justification
for Plaintiff’s conduct. As such, sanctions are clearly warranted.
Based on the
foregoing, LACADA’s motion to compel is granted. Plaintiff is sanctioned, jointly
and severally, $700.00, to be paid within 30 days of entry of this order.
($350/hr x 2 hr.)
It is so ordered.
Dated: February
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied entry
if admission could create a public health risk.
The court encourages the parties wishing to argue to appear via L.A.
Court Connect. For more information,
please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult
times is appreciated.