Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 19STCV39580, Date: 2022-10-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV39580 Hearing Date: October 7, 2022 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
TERRY
HERRERA and TEODORA HERRERA vs. FULL
CIRCLE REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, INC; THE MUM GROUP, IN; MARVIN U. MANGABAT;
ERIK LEDERMAN
Defendants. |
Case No.:
19STCV39580 Hearing
Date: October 7, 2022 |
The Intervenors’ motion for an order granting leave to
file a Complaint in Intervention is GRANTED.
On November 4, 2019, Plaintiffs Terry Herrera and Teodora
Herrera (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed suit against Full Circle Real Estate
Solutions, Inc. (Full Circle), the Mum Group, Marvin U. Mangabat, and Erik
Lederman. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (FAC), alleging: (1)
intentional misrepresentation; (2) concealment; (3) negligent
misrepresentation; (4) conversion; (5) elder abuse; (6) rescission of contract;
(7) violation of Business and Professions Code section 7163; (8) breach of
fiduciary duty; (9) cancellation of instruments; (11) declaratory relief; (12)
unjust enrichment; (13) equitable lien; (14) preliminary and permanent
injunction; and (15) violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200.
Now,
non-parties Massis Tarbinian and Houry Kelian (collectively, Intervenors) move
for order granting them leave to file a complaint in intervention.
Discussion
The
Intervenors purchased the Subject Property at issue in this case at a public
auction on 2/8/2022 for the sum of $1,002,500.00. On 2/24/2022, the Trustee
Sale Officer executed and acknowledged a Trustee's Deed Upon Sale naming
intervenors as the record titleholders of the Subject Property ("Husband
and Wife as Community Property"). The Trustee Sale Officer, on March 9,
2022, caused that Trustee's Deed Upon Sale to be recorded at the 25 Offices of
the Los Angeles County Recorder, as Instrument No. 20220272582.
The
Intervenors argue that they should be allowed to intervene given that they
claim sole ownership of the Subject Property by virtue of their recorded deed,
and Plaintiffs’ SAC seeks a judgment adverse to the intervenors’ ownership
interest in the Subject Property.
CCP section 397, subdivision (d)(1)
provides that the court shall, upon timely
application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the action or proceeding if
either of the following conditions is satisfied:
(A) A provision of law confers an
unconditional right to intervene.
(B) The person seeking intervention claims an
interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and that
person is so situated that the disposition of the action may impair or
impede that person's ability to protect that interest, unless that person's
interest is adequately represented by one or
more of the existing parties.
The Court agrees that intervention is mandated here by
CCP section 397,
subdivision (d)(1)(B). The Intervenors claim an interest in the Subject
Property here, and their ability to protect that interest would be impaired if
they were excluded from this litigation. Given their particular interest, there
is an inadequate basis to conclude that the Intervenors’ interest is adequately
represented by one or more of the existing parties.
Based on the foregoing, the
Intervenors’ motion for an order granting leave to file a Complaint in
Intervention is granted.
It is
so ordered.
Dated: October
, 2022
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend
to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If all parties to a
motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.
Due to
Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.