Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV07283, Date: 2023-02-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV07283 Hearing Date: February 1, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
ERA
NOUVEAU HOLDINGS, LLC vs. SOUTHERN
MOTION, INC. |
Case No.:
20STCV07283 Hearing
Date: February 1, 2023 |
Enouvation’s
motion to compel further responses is GRANTED. Southern Motion is sanctioned,
jointly and severally with counsel, $2, 450.00.
On 2/21/2020,
Plaintiff Era Nouveau Holdings, LLC (Era Nouveau or Enouvation) filed
a Complaint against Southern Motion, Inc. (Southern Motion), setting forth
a claim for declaratory relief and a claim for breach of
contract. Southern Motion answered
and cross-complained against Era Nouveau, adding Era Nouveau
USA, LLC (EN USA LLC) and Era Nouveau, LLC (EN LLC) as Cross-Defendants
and setting forth claims for 1) fraudulent misrepresentations; 2) fraudulent
concealment; 3) breach of implied warranty of merchantability; 4) breach of
implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose; 5) breach of contract; and
6) violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200.
On 5/15/2020, Southern
Motion filed a Cross-Complaint against ERA Nouveau Holdings, LLC, ERA Nouveau
USA, LLC, and ERA Nouveau, LLC. On June 5, 2020, Southern Motion
added Samuel Contreras as Roe 1, Nathan Munton as Roe 2, and
Thomas Peper as Roe 3. Munton specially appeared and moved to quash service of
summons. On September 29, 2020, the Court granted the motion.
On October 8, 2020, Southern Motion
filed its First Amended Cross-Complaint (FAXC), adding David Witmer as a
Cross-Defendant and setting forth the same six claims. As of today’s date,
Witmer has not yet formally appeared in this action. On May 4, 2021, the Court overruled a demurrer to
Southern Motion’s Second Amended Cross-Complaint (SAC).
Now,
Enouvation moves to compel further responses from Southern Motion to its
Special Interrogatories. Enouvation also seeks monetary sanctions.
The
motion is unopposed.
Discussion
Enouvation
argues good cause exists to compel further responses to Enouvation’s Second Set
of Special Interrogatory Nos. 32-48.
The
Court agrees. The Special Interrogatories seeks information that is
indisputably directly related to the claims and core allegations in its
lawsuit.
The
Court finds sanctions warranted. Not only is Enouvation clearly entitled to the
discovery at issue here, but Southern Motion failed to respond in any manner to
any of Enouvation’s efforts to meet and confer, to any correspondence relating
to the deficient responses at issue here, or to any voicemail messages. (Mesa
Decl., ¶ 12) Southern Motion also failed to opposed this motion. Southern
Motion is sanctioned, jointly and severally with counsel, $2,450. ($250 x 7
hrs.)
Based
on the foregoing, Enouvation’s motion to compel further responses is granted.
It is so ordered.
Dated: February
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.