Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV07283, Date: 2023-02-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV07283 Hearing Date: February 27, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
| 
   ERA
  NOUVEAU HOLDINGS, LLC                                      vs. SOUTHERN
  MOTION, INC.                                            | 
  
    Case No.: 
  20STCV07283  Hearing
  Date:  February 27, 2023  | 
 
Enouvation’s
motion to compel further responses is DENIED.  
            On 2/21/2020,
Plaintiff Era Nouveau Holdings, LLC (Era Nouveau or Enouvation) filed
a Complaint against Southern Motion, Inc. (Southern Motion), setting forth
a claim for declaratory relief and a claim for breach of
contract. Southern Motion answered
and cross-complained against Era Nouveau, adding Era Nouveau
USA, LLC (EN USA LLC) and Era Nouveau, LLC (EN LLC) as
Cross-Defendants and setting forth claims for 1) fraudulent misrepresentations;
2) fraudulent concealment; 3) breach of implied warranty of merchantability; 4)
breach of implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose; 5) breach of
contract; and 6) violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200. 
On 5/15/2020, Southern
Motion filed a Cross-Complaint against ERA Nouveau Holdings, LLC, ERA Nouveau
USA, LLC, and ERA Nouveau, LLC. On June 5, 2020, Southern Motion
added Samuel Contreras as Roe 1, Nathan Munton as Roe 2, and
Thomas Peper as Roe 3. Munton specially appeared and moved to quash service of
summons. On September 29, 2020, the Court granted the motion. 
 
On October 8, 2020, Southern Motion
filed its First Amended Cross-Complaint (FAXC), adding David Witmer as a
Cross-Defendant and setting forth the same six claims. As of today’s date,
Witmer has not yet formally appeared in this action. On May 4, 2021, the Court overruled a demurrer to
Southern Motion’s Second Amended Cross-Complaint (SAC). 
            Now,
Enouvation moves to compel further responses from Southern Motion to its
Special Interrogatories. Enouvation also seeks monetary sanctions. 
Discussion 
            In
its initial motion, Enouvation argued good cause existed to compel further
responses to Enouvation’s Second Set of Special Interrogatory Nos. 32-48.
            In
opposition, Southern Motion notes that the briefing schedule of this motion was
moved after it was explained during an ex parte hearing that Southern Motion
had been unable to meet and confer with Enouvation due to the hospitalization
of its counsel. Southern Motion has since supplemented all of its responses. 
            The
Court agrees that, given the circumstances, sanctions are not warranted. The
purpose of sanctions is punish and deter abuses of the discovery process. Here,
Southern Motion failed to meet and confer due to a medical emergency, brought
this to the Court’s attention thereby promoting the interests of judicial
economy and efficiency, and then supplemented its responses prior to the
rescheduled hearing. 
            Based
on the foregoing, Enouvation’s motion to compel further responses is denied. 
It is so ordered. 
Dated:  February   
, 2023
                                                                                                                                                           
   Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
   Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative. 
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order.  If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.  
            Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances.  Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk.  The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect. 
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517.  Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.