Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV08464, Date: 2023-05-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV08464 Hearing Date: July 10, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
DOMINGO
LOZA vs. KIA
MOTORS AMERICA, INC. |
Case No.:
20STCV08464 Hearing
Date: July 10, 2023 |
Defendant’s
motion for relief is GRANTED.
On 3/2/2020,
Plaintiff Domingo Loza filed suit against Kia Motors America, Inc. alleging:
(1) breach of express warranty; (2) breach of implied warranty; and (3)
violation of the Song Beverly Act section 1793.2.
Now,
Defendant moves for relief from the ruling issued on 3/27/2023 awarding Plaintiff
costs in the sum of $84,917.69, based on Defendant’s own mistake and excusable
neglect.
Discussion
On
3/27/2023, the Court granted in part, denied in part Defendant’s motion to tax
Plaintiff’s costs. As such, the overall cost amount sought, $89,695.27, was
reduced to $84,917.69.
Now,
Defendant argues that:
Attorney
Bradley E. Rankell drafted KA's Motion to Tax Plaintiff's Costs and KA's Reply
in support of the Motion. He was not, however, involved in the case in January
2022, when KA served its Offer to Compromise. Through mistake, inadvertence,
surprise and/or excusable neglect Mr. Rankell did not realize that KA had
served an Offer to Compromise and did not realize that Plaintiff’s costs and
expenses are limited to $4,333.50, the amount of costs and expenses incurred by
Plaintiff as of January 20, 2022.
(Motion,
3:4-9.)
CCP
section 473, subdivision (b), provides in pertinent part: "The court may,
upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative
from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her
through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.
Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or
other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall
not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case
exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was
taken."
Here, Mr.
Rankell submitted a declaration stating that through his own mistake, he did
not realize KA had served an Offer to Compromise and did not realize that
Plaintiff’s costs and expenses should be limited to, the amount of costs and
expenses incurred by Plaintiff as of January 20, 2022, pursuant to CCP section
998 (c)(1). (See Rankell Decl.)
The Court
agrees that relief is warranted. While Mr. Rankell’s conduct was negligent, CCP
section 998 sets out clear statutory directives as to what costs may be
recovered by law after a 998 offer is made and rejected. As such, the amount of
costs Plaintiff is entitled to is not discretionary. To allow Plaintiff to
preserve the awarded windfall in costs, based on Defendant’s counsel’s
negligence, would be to allow Plaintiff to obtain more than she is entitled to
by law. Such a result runs counter to interests of justice and equity.
In Le Francois v. Goel
(2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094 that even when CCP section 1008 precludes a party from
moving for reconsideration, a trial court has inherent authority to correct an
erroneous ruling on its own motion. As such, the Court finds that CCP section
1008 does not preclude relief here.
Based on the
foregoing, Defendant’s motion for relief is granted.
It is so ordered.
Dated: July
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court website
at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar. For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517.