Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV13063, Date: 2023-02-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV13063 Hearing Date: February 1, 2023 Dept: 17
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
MIAWA
INVESTMENT, INC., et al. vs. ZHOU
CAI, et al. |
Case No.:
20STCV13063 Hearing
Date: February 1, 2023 |
Plaintiff’s
motion to compel Defendant MKM Trading LLC to appear for deposition is GRANTED.
Defendant is
sanctioned, jointly and severally with counsel, $1050.00.
On 4/2/2020,
Plaintiff Miawa Investment, Inc. and Maggie-Dawson, Inc. (collectively, Plaintiffs)
filed suit against Zhou Cai, and Vista Selection, Inc., alleging: (1) breach of
contract; and (2) fraud.
On
5/26/2020, Zhou Cai and Vita Selection, Inc. filed a cross-complaint against
Miawa Investment, Maggie-Dawson, Inc., Juan Li, and Seven Bubble, Inc.,
alleging: (1) breach of contract; (2) common counts; (3) fraud; (4) intentional
tort; and (5) general negligence.
On
3/1/2022, Vista Selection, Inc. filed a cross-complaint against MKM Trading,
LLC and Christie Ly (collectively, MKM Defendants), alleging: (1) breach of
contract; and (2) fraud.
Now,
Plaintiffs move to compel Defendant MKM Trading LLC to appear for deposition.
The motion is
unopposed.
Discussion
Plaintiffs
move to compel Defendant MKM Trading LLC to appear for deposition.
On 9/29/2022, Plaintiff a served
Notice of Deposition on Defendant MKM Trading LLC. Without objection to the deposition,
Defendant’s counsel, Mr. Nash, stated Defendant was not available on 10/19/2022
and promised to provide some available dates. Defendant’s counsel then failed
to respond. Defendant and counsel failed to appear for the noticed deposition,
failed to offer alternative dates, and failed to oppose this motion.
Code of Civil Procedure § 2025.450
provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
(a) If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the
action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a
person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230,
without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear
for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any
document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the
deposition notice, the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling
the deponent’s attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of
any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in
the deposition notice.
(b) A motion under subdivision (a) shall comply with both of the
following:
(1)
The motion shall set forth specific facts showing good cause
justifying the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored
information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.
(2) The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer
declaration under Section 2016.040, or, when the deponent fails to attend the
deposition and produce the documents, electronically stored information, or
things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the
petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance.
Plaintiff’s
motion complies with all procedural requirements. Plaintiff’s motion is granted.
Defendant failed to oppose this motion and thus has not offered any substantial
justification for its conduct. Defendant is sanctioned, jointly and severally
with counsel, $1,050.00. ($350/hr x 3 hr.)
It is
so ordered.
Dated: February
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend
to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If all parties to a
motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.
Due to
Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.