Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV31251, Date: 2023-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV31251 Hearing Date: May 23, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
DEFAULT JUDGMENT REVIEW
|
JEANETTE BUSTOS
vs. H2 FASHION, et al. |
Case
No.: 20STCV31251 Hearing Date: May 23, 2023 |
Plaintiff’s motion to set aside is GRANTED.
On 8/18/2020, Plaintiff Jeanette Bustos filed suits
against H2 Fashion and Hung Tong, alleging: (1) discrimination; (2)
retaliation; (3) failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation; (4) failure
to provide reasonable accommodations; (5) failure to engage in a good faith
interactive process; (6) declaratory judgment; (7) wrongful termination in
violation of public policy; (8) failure to pay wages; (9) failure to pay
minimum wages; (10) failure to pay overtime compensation; (11) failure to
provide meal and rest periods; (12) failure to provide itemized wages
statements; (13) waiting time penalties; (14) unfair competition; and (15)
failure to permit inspection of personnel and payroll records.
On 8/29/2022, the Court entered an order of dismissal of
Plaintiff’s action without prejudice after she failed to appear and re-filed
virtually the same default judgment packet that was previously rejected.
Now,
Plaintiff moves to set aside the entry of dismissal.
Discussion
On
2/22/2023, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion without prejudice, after it
became clear that the wrong parties had been served with the moving papers.
Now, having
followed the Court’s recommendation to amend and serve the Motion appropriately
and then refile, Plaintiff seeks to set aside the Court’s dismissal of her
action on the grounds that counsel never received this Court’s orders setting a
hearing on 8/25/2022 for failure to perfect the default package, and never
received this Court’s Order of Dismissal dated 8/29/2022.
The
mandatory relief provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 473 subs. (b)
provides, in part:
Notwithstanding any other requirements of
this section, the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no
more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is
accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake,
inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any (1) resulting default entered by
the clerk..., or (2) resulting default judgment or dismissal entered....
Case
law instructs that so long as counsel is willing to fall on their sword, relief
is mandatory. (See Abers v. Rohrs (2013)
217 Cal.App.4th 1199, 1210 (Section 473's provision for mandatory relief from a
dismissal based upon a declaration of attorney error does not require a
determination the error was excusable. It applies even when the attorney has no
excuse. Relief is mandatory when a complying affidavit is filed, even if the
attorney's neglect was inexcusable.).) The only limitation is when the court
finds [that] the default [or dismissal] was not in fact the attorney's fault,
for example when the attorney is simply covering up for the client. (Todd v.
Thrifty Corp. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 986, 991.)
Here, Plaintiff’s counsel submitted
a declaration explaining that he neglected to file a Notice of Change of
Address and as a result did not receive the Court’s notices of the 8/25/2022
OSC or the 8/29/2022 order of dismissal. (Ujkic Decl., ¶ 8.)
Given counsels’ declaration taking responsibility for the
dismissal, relief is mandatory. (Abers, supra, 217 Cal.App.4th at
p. 1210.)
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s
motion to set aside is granted.
It is
so ordered.
Dated: May
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend
to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If all parties to a
motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.
Due to
Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.