Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV33045, Date: 2023-02-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV33045 Hearing Date: February 17, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
BRIAND ESQUIRE
vs. PETER DAVID
WALKER, et al. |
Case
No.: 20STCV33045 Hearing Date: February 17, 2023 |
Defendants’
demurrer is SUSTAINED, WITH 20 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.
On
8/31/2020, Plaintiff Briand Esquire (Plaintiff) filed suit against Peter David
Walker, Lisa Michelle Walker, Audry Olson, Raymond Sharp, Gourmet Demonstration
Services, Inc., and Natural Choice Marketing, LLC, asserting 46 causes of
action.
Now,
Defendants the Lemon Perfect Company and Yann-Alfred Jeffrey Hufnagel
(collectively, Defendants) demur to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Discussion
Defendants
argue that Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts to state a claim against
them.
The
Court agrees.
Here,
Plaintiff’s 46 causes of action are based on unidentified “overt acts” by
Defendants between January 2019 and October 2020 which allegedly caused
unidentified damages. Plaintiff does not allege any facts to show what kind of
relationship he had with Defendants. As such, Plaintiff necessarily has not
alleged any facts which could show that Defendants breached an alleged duty to
Plaintiff, or that Plaintiff suffered any damages.
Conclusory
allegations that the “acts of defendants were negligent” is insufficient.
Plaintiff must allege facts which could show that Defendants were
negligent. Plaintiff’s remaining 45 causes of action suffer from similar
deficiencies, i.e., conclusory allegations. Plaintiff’s opposition only
confirms the ambiguous nature of the FAC by conceding that only 16 of the 46
causes of action are alleged against Defendants, and by attempting to add new
facts not alleged in the underlying complaint.
Based
on the foregoing, Defendants’ demurrer is sustained, with 20 days leave to
amend. In granting leave, Plaintiff is advised that he must abide by Court
rules regarding formatting and page-limits.
It is so ordered.
Dated: February
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.