Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV40085, Date: 2023-04-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV40085 Hearing Date: April 19, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE RULING
MARION NEWMAN by and through her
successor-in-interest Tiffany Newman, et al.
vs. KND DEVELOPMENT
52, LLA dba Kindred Hospital Baldwin Park |
Case
No.: 20STCV40085 Hearing Date: April 19, 2023 |
Pomona’s
demurrer is SUSTAINED WITH 20 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.
Accordingly,
Defendant’s motion to strike is MOOT.
On
10/19/2020, Plaintiff Marion Newman by and through her successor-in-interest
Tiffany Newman, and Tiffany Newman individually filed suit against KND
Development 52, LLC dba Kindred Hospital Baldwin Park as Defendant and Debbie
Newman, Donna Shelvin, Wesley Newman, Marion Newman, Christine Newman, and Jill
Newman as nominal Defendants. On 1/6/2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended
complaint (FAC) alleging: (1) elder abuse; and (2) wrongful death.
On
5/12/2022, Plaintiff substituted Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center for Doe
2.
Now,
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical (Pomona or Defendant) demurs to Plaintiff’s FAC.
Defendant also moves to strike portions of Plaintiff’s FAC.
Discussion
Pomona
argues that Plaintiff has failed to allege elder abuse and wrongful death with
the requisite specificity.
The
Court agrees.
In
relation to the claims being subject to demurrer, to state a private cause of
action for elder abuse, the plaintiff must plead facts showing two elements:
(1) the defendant has subjected an elder to statutorily-defined physical abuse,
neglect or financial abuse; and (2) the defendant acted with recklessness,
malice, oppression, or fraud in the commission of the abuse. (Welf. & Inst.
Code § 15657.) “Neglect”
in this case is statutorily defined in relevant part as “[t]he negligent
failure of any person having the care or custody of an elder or a dependent
adult to exercise that degree of care that a reasonable person in a like
position would exercise” (Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.57,¿subd.
(a)(1)); and “abuse” is defined in relevant part as “[p]hysical¿abuse,
neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment with resulting
physical harm or pain or mental suffering” or “[t]he deprivation by a care
custodian of goods or services that are necessary to avoid physical harm or
mental suffering.”¿(Id.,
§ 15610.07,¿subd. (a)(1)-(2).)¿
Here, Plaintiff alleges that Decedent was not provided
with the proper supervision and care necessary to prevent her from developing
pressure injuries and skin breakdown. Plaintiff also alleges that Decedent developed
sepsis, which ultimately was listed as one of her causes of death. However, Plaintiff’s FAC creates uncertainty
as to what entity was providing what care, thereby creating further uncertainty
as to whether or not Plaintiff’s alleged facts could show the requisite
causation.
Plaintiff
alleges that Decedent was admitted to Pomona free of pressure injuries and skin
breakdown, and that from 2/5/2020-2/22/2020, she developed pressure injuries.
(FAC ¶¶ 33-38.) Plaintiff alleges that on 2/22/2020, Defendant discharged Decedent
to Pomona Valley Rehabilitation Center for skilled nursing
care. (FAC ¶ 38.) However, Plaintiff alleges that on
3/25/2020, Decedent was admitted to Kindred Hospital Baldwin Park. While at
Kindred Hospital Baldwin Park, Decedent developed sepsis, and on 7/20202 was
placed in the ICU and pronounced dead that same day.
As
such, there was a five month separation between the
care Decedent received at Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center—the moving
party here—and her death five months later under the care of Kindred Hospital Baldwin Park, Plaintiff must allege additional
facts which could show a causal connection between the alleged skin breakdown
in Defendant’s care and her eventual death while in the care of another
facility. In particular, Plaintiff must allege particular facts related to
Decedent’s alleged skin breakdown, and the circumstances surrounding her
breakdown attributed to alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiff must also allege specific
facts which could show how Defendant’s staff caused the alleged skin breakdown,
and how those injuries caused her development of sepsis, and eventually her
death. Plaintiff’s conclusory and boilerplate allegation that Defendant did not
provide “necessary supervision” as well as “needed medical care and services”
is insufficient.
Plaintiff’s second cause of action suffers from the same
deficiencies. To support a cause of action for
wrongful death, a plaintiff must not only prove that a defendant was negligent,
but that the negligence was the legal cause of any alleged injuries. Here,
Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts which could show how Defendant’s
staff caused the alleged skin breakdown, and how that caused her death five
months later while in the care of Kindred Hospital
Baldwin Park.
However, the Court notes that Plaintiff’s allegations are
sufficient at the pleading stage to show that Defendant is a long-term care
facility. While Defendant may strongly refute this contention, the Court must
accept-well pled allegations as true. As such, a determination as to whether or
not Defendant does, in fact, meet the criteria for a long-term care facility is
not properly decided at this stage.
Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s demurrer is
sustained, with 20 days leave to amend.
It is so ordered.
Dated: April
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative
as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is strongly
discouraging in-person appearances.
Parties, counsel, and court reporters present are subject to temperature
checks and health inquiries, and will be denied entry if admission could create
a public health risk. The court
encourages the parties wishing to argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect. For more information, please contact the
court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your
understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.