Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 20STCV46143, Date: 2023-04-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV46143 Hearing Date: April 24, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
JUAN
ANTONIO ALVIZUREZ, et al. vs. BEACH
CITY PROPERTIES, INC. |
Case No.:
20STCV46143 Hearing
Date: April 24, 2023 |
Plaintiffs’
motion for leave to amend is GRANTED.
On
12/3/2020, Plaintiffs Juan Antonio Alvizurez, Arely I. Perez, Keily D. Perez, a
minor by and through her guardian ad litem Arely I. Perez, Darwin E. Perez, a
minor by and through her guardian ad litem Arely I. Perez, Justin N. Perez, a
minor by and through her guardian ad litem Arely I. Perez, Flor De Maria
Marroquin, Angela V. Garcia minor by and through her guardian ad litem Flor De
Maria Marroquin, and Yanelin R. Perez filed suit against Beach City Properties,
alleging: (1) breach of implied warranty of habitability; (2) breach of
statutory warranty of habitability; (3) breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment;
(4) negligence; (5) violation of Civil Code section 1942.4; and (6) private
nuisance.
Now,
Plaintiffs seek leave to amend to add two causes of action for alter-ego
liability and violation of Civil Code section 1940.5.
Discussion
In
support of their motion to leave, Plaintiffs explain that they became aware of
alter-ego allegations after they deposed Amelia Bjork, a principal of
Defendant, and she admitted to the comingling of corporate affairs with
personal affairs, such as “entering into contractual relationships for the
subject property under Defendant Bjork’s name as an induvial rather than the
corporation, and the possibility making material representations to the City of
Los Angeles regarding property tax/occupant exemptions, thereby substantially
affecting the corporate formalities required. Such acts were created to defraud
creditors and shield personal liability for personal acts.” (Motion for Leave,
1:28-2:6.)
Plaintiffs
further explain that they “recently discovered that during the operative lease
agreement, Defendants threatened to report Plaintiffs’ immigration status to
law enforcement agencies and immigration authorities with the intent to harass,
retaliate and deter Plaintiffs from exercising their right to reside in a
habitable property.” (Motion for Leave, 2: 8-12.)
“This statutory provision giving the
courts the power to permit amendments in furtherance of justice has received a
very liberal interpretation by the courts of this state.” (Klopstock v.
Superior Court (1941) Cal.2d 13, 19. The policy favoring leave to
amend is so strong that it is an abuse of discretion to deny an amendment
unless the adverse party can show meaningful prejudice, such as the running of
the statute of limitations, trial delay, the loss of critical evidence, or
added preparation costs. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003)
109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.)
Here,
trial is not set until 7/24/23, and Defendants have not shown they will suffer
any meaningful prejudice if the amendments are allowed.
Based on the
foregoing, Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend is granted.
It is
so ordered.
Dated: April
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend
to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If all parties to a
motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.
Due to
Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied entry
if admission could create a public health risk.
The court encourages the parties wishing to argue to appear via L.A.
Court Connect. For more information,
please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult
times is appreciated.