Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 21STCV12443, Date: 2023-02-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV12443 Hearing Date: February 24, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE RULING
| 
   CARUSO AFFILIATED HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.
           
  vs. ALLIED WORLD
  ASSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.) INC.,  et al.    | 
  
    Case
  No.:  21STCV12443  Hearing Date: February 24, 2023  | 
 
Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint
is GRANTED. 
On 4/1/2021, Plaintiffs Caruso Affiliated Holdings, LLC,
Caruso Management Company, Ltd., Americana Housing L.P., Americana Homes, LLC, Americana
Homes II, LLC, and the Americana at Brand, LLC (collectively, Plaintiffs),
filed suit against Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., (AWAC) Endurance
American Specialty Insurance Company, Endurance Assurance Corporation, Arthur
J. Gallagher & Co. Insurance Brokers of California (Gallagher). On
1/10/2023, Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (FAC) alleging: (1)
declaratory relief; (2) reformation; (3) negligence; (4) negligent
misrepresentation; and (5) breach of fiduciary duty.
Now, Plaintiffs move for leave to file an amended
complaint. 
Discussion
            Plaintiffs seek leave to amend to
file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs argue that leave is appropriate because
they do not seek to add any substantive allegations, parties, or causes of
action, but rather seek to substantially narrow the scope of the case to the
named insured issues arising from the operations policies issued by AWAC and
Sompo. 
“This statutory provision giving the
courts the power to permit amendments in furtherance of justice has received a
very liberal interpretation by the courts of this state.” (Klopstock v.
Superior Court (1941) Cal.2d 13, 19. The policy favoring leave to
amend is so strong that it is an abuse of discretion to deny an amendment
unless the adverse party can show meaningful prejudice, such as the running of
the statute of limitations, trial delay, the loss of critical evidence, or
added preparation costs.  (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003)
109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.)
            Here,
the Court agrees that it is in the interests of justice and judicial economy
to   allow Plaintiffs to file an updated complaint
which removes allegations no longer relevant to Plaintiffs’ narrowed claims.
Importantly, there is no indication that this will result in prejudice to any
party. 
            Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs’
motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted. 
It is
so ordered. 
Dated:  February   
, 2023
                                                                                                                                                           
   Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
   Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend
to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party
submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and
must identify the party submitting on the tentative.  If all parties to a
motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order.  If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  
            Due to
Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances.  Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk.  The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect. 
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517.  Your understanding during these difficult
times is appreciated.