Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 21STCV47256, Date: 2022-07-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV47256 Hearing Date: July 28, 2022 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
STEPHEN GREGORY MASTEY
vs. MASTEY DE PARIS, INC., et al. |
Case
No.: 21STCV47256 Hearing Date: July 29, 2022 |
The demurrer
is MOOT IN PART, NOT CONSIDERED IN PART. The demurrer is moot as to Defendants
Lesley Calderon, Erick Calderon, Henri Mastey, and the Henri Mastey Living
Trust. The Court does not consider the demurrer as to Revucell Organics, LLC or
Mastey de Paris, Inc.
On
12/28/2021, Plaintiff Stephen Gregory Mastey (Plaintiff) filed suit against
Mastey de Paris, Inc., Lesley Calderon, Erick Calderon, Revucell Organics, LLC,
Henri Mastey, and the Henri Mastey Living Trust (collectively, Defendants),
alleging: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of contract; (3) breach of
contract; (3) unjust enrichment; (5) fraudulent concealment; (6) conversion;
(7) breach of fiduciary responsibilities; (8) embezzlement; (9) fraud; (10)
fraud in the inducement; (11) unfair competition; (12) quantum meruit; (12)
prima facie tort; and (13) promissory estoppel.
On
6/7/2022, the Court granted Defendants’ special motion to strike as to
Defendants Lesley Calderon, Erick Calderon, Henri Mastey, and the Henri Mastey
Living Trust. However, the Court did not consider the motion as to Revucell
Organics, LLC or Mastey de Paris, Inc. (Suspended Defendants), given that both
are in suspended status.
Now,
Defendants have a demurrer and motion to strike set for 7/29/2022. In light of
the anti-SLAPP ruling, the demurrer is moot as to Defendants Lesley Calderon,
Erick Calderon, Henri Mastey, and the Henri Mastey Living Trust. As for the
Suspended Defendants, they may
not prosecute or defend an action in a California Court, and thus the Court may
consider the merits of their demurrer. (Timberline, Inc. v.
Jaisinghani, (1997) 54 Cal. App. 4th 1361.)
On 7/14/2022, Suspended Defendants filed
a declaration indicating that they remained in suspended status, and requesting
a six-month continuance. Suspended Defendants explained that Defendant Mastey is on hospice care, and that their statuses could
be revived in six months after his passing.
However,
for a number of reasons, the Court cannot grant this relief. First, Suspended
Defendants may not request a continuance of their own motion. Rather, the
proper procedure is to withdraw the motion from calendar. Second, to continue
the motion would preserve Suspended Defendants’ responsive pleading thereby
violating the rule that they may not participate in this action in any way.
Third, Suspended Defendants’ declaration does not include any explanation as to
why the corporations cannot be revived until Defendant Mastey’s passing. As
such, there is insufficient evidence to support a continuance.
Based
on the foregoing, the demurrer is moot in part, not considered in part. The
demurrer is moot as to Defendants Lesley Calderon, Erick Calderon, Henri
Mastey, and the Henri Mastey Living Trust. The Court does not consider the
demurrer as to Suspended Defendants.
It is so ordered.
Dated: July
, 2022
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.