Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 22STCV06872, Date: 2023-02-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV06872 Hearing Date: February 23, 2023 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT
17
TENTATIVE RULING
JUNNY KIM
vs. YOUNG HEE LEE
d/b/a GRACE TOGO |
Case
No.: 22STCV06872 Hearing Date: February 24, 2023 |
Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
On
9/30/2022, Plaintiff Junny Kim (Plaintiff) filed suit against Young Hee Lee dba
Grace Togo, alleging: (1) failure to pay minimum wage; (2) unpaid overtime; (3)
unpaid meal period premiums; (4) unpaid rest period premiums; (5) waiting time
penalties; (6) non-compliant wage statements; (7) failure to reimburse business
expenses; and (8) violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200.
Now,
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment of the Complaint.
The
motion is unopposed.
Discussion
Plaintiff
argues that she is entitled to summary judgment because Defendant has admitted
to the following:
-
Plaintiff was employed by Defendant
from July 7, 2020 to January 31, 2022;
-
Plaintiff was a non-exempt employee;
-
Plaintiff worked from 4:30 a.m. to 2:30
p.m. (10 hours/day) Monday through Friday;
-
Plaintiff was paid a fixed day rate of
$128.00 ($16.00 x 8 hours);
-
Plaintiff was paid an hourly rate of $16.00;
-
Plaintiff was not paid overtime for
hours worked beyond 8 hours per day;
-
Plaintiff was not paid overtime for
hours worked beyond 40 hours per week;
-
Plaintiff was not paid 2 hours of
overtime each day he worked;
-
Plaintiff did not receive uninterrupted
rest periods;
-
Plaintiff did not receive his
uninterrupted meal periods;
-
Plaintiff drove between 400 - 500 miles
per day;
-
Plaintiff drove his own car to make
deliveries;
-
Plaintiff did not receive mileage
reimbursements for driving; and
-
Plaintiff did not receive wage
statements.
(See SS
¶¶ 1- 22.)
Plaintiff’s
evidence supports a reasonable inference that Defendant failed to pay minimum
wage, failed to pay owed overtime, failed to pay meal and rest period premiums,
failed to issue wage statements, and failed to reimburse business expenses.
Accordingly, the burden shifts to Defendant to disclose a triable issue of
material fact.
Defendant
failed to oppose this motion and thus has not met the burden of proof to
disclose a triable issue of material fact.
Based on the
foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
It is so ordered.
Dated: February
, 2023
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.