Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 23STCV08297, Date: 2025-01-08 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV08297 Hearing Date: January 8, 2025 Dept: 17
County of Los
Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
WARING PLAZA PROPERTIES, L.P.
vs. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP, et
al. |
Case
No.: 23STCV08297 Hearing Date: January 8, 2025 |
Waring’s
motion for leave to amend to file an SAC is GRANTED.
On 4/14/2023,
Plaintiff Waring Plaza Properties, L.P. (Waring) filed suit against Manatt,
Phelps & Phillips, LLP and Benjamin G. Shatz. On 5/6/2024, Plainiff filed a
first amended complaint (FAC) alleging: (1) professional negligence; (2) breach
of implied contract; and (3) common counts.
On
7/5/2023, Cross-Complainant Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP filed a
cross-complaint (XC) against Waring Plaza Properties, L.P., alleging: (1)
breach of written contract; (2) open book account; and (3) quantum meruit; and
(4) breach of implied-in-fact contract.
Now,
Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Waring Plaza Properties L.P. (Waring) seeks leave
to file a second amended complaint (SAC).
Discussion
Waring
seeks leave to amend to add a new cause of action for violation of Business and
Professions Code section 17200 et seq. and remove two causes of action from the
first amended complaint (FAC) that are moot because the court sustained
defendants Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP (Manatt) and Benjamin G. Shatz’s
demurrer to those two causes of action. The proposed SAC does not contain any
new facts. The only addition is a new legal theory that seeks restitution of
fees Waring paid Defendants in the same amount as the damages alleged under the
FAC.
The
policy favoring leave to amend is so strong that it is an abuse of discretion
to deny an amendment unless the adverse party can show meaningful prejudice.
(Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.)
Here, trial
is more than nine months away. No depositions have been taken. Only basic
written discovery has been exchanged, and Waring has no additional information
to provide Defendants regarding the new claim. As such, Defendants have not
identified any meaningful prejudice it would suffer if leave to amend were
granted.
Based on the
foregoing, Waring’s motion for leave to amend to file an SAC is granted.
It is so ordered.
Dated: January
, 2025
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar. For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517.