Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 23STCV19784, Date: 2024-04-09 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STCV19784    Hearing Date: April 9, 2024    Dept: 17

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 17

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

TADIJA DUKIC

                          

         vs.

 

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.

 

 Case No.:  23STCV18784

 

 

 

 Hearing Date:  April 9, 2024

 

 

Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. As such, the Court declines to award sanctions at this time.

 

            On 8/18/2023, Plaintiff Tadija Dukic (Plaintiff) filed suit against Volkswagen Group of America (Defendant), alleging violations of the Song-Beverly Act.

 

            On 1/24/2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses from Defendant to his Requests for Production (RFPs)

 

Discussion

 

Plaintiffs argue that good cause exists to compel further responses to his RFP Nos. 1-31.  

 

After review of the relevant discovery responses, the Court finds many of Plaintiff’s requests to be overly broad in scope. For example, Plaintiff seeks all substantially similar customer complaints for all other 2020 Volkswagen Passat vehicles.  However, the Court also finds certain objections by Defendant to be unfounded. For example, Defendant argues that customer complaints concerning other vehicles are irrelevant per se. In addition to all requested materials related to Plaintiff’s car itself (which Defendant has already agreed to produce):

 

1.      Defendant shall produce the “Warranty Policy and Procedure Manual” published by Defendant and provided to its authorized repair facilities, within the State of California, for the period of purchase to present.

 

2.      Defendant shall produce any internal analysis or investigation regarding defects concerning the transmission defect in vehicles for the same year, make, and model of the subject vehicle.

 

3.       Defendant shall produce any customer complaints relating to defects that are similar to the alleged defects claimed by plaintiff in vehicles within California for the same year, make, and model of the subject vehicle, for the period of purchase to present.

 

4.       Defendant shall produce all documents evidencing policies and procedures used to evaluate customer requests for repurchase pursuant to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, for the period of purchase to present.

 

5.       Technical Service Bulletins and Recall Notices for vehicles purchased in California for the same year, make and model of the subject vehicle. 

 

6.        All other requests for further production are DENIED.

 

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part, denied in part. As such, the Court declines to award sanctions at this time.

 

 

It is so ordered.

 

Dated:  April    , 2024

                                                                                                                                                          

   Hon. Jon R. Takasugi
   Judge of the Superior Court

 

 

 

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.  If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order.  If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517.