Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 23STCV21713, Date: 2024-02-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STCV21713    Hearing Date: February 20, 2024    Dept: 17

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 17

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

FRANCES REYNOLDS

 

         vs.

 

ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, et al.

 

 Case No.:  23STCV21713  

 

 

 

 Hearing Date:  February 20, 2024

 

            Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED.

 

            On 9/8/2023, Plaintiff Frances Reynolds (Plaintiff) filed suit against Ross Dress for Less, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., and Luis Ruiz (collectively, Defendants), alleging: (1) defamation per se; (2) defamation per quod; (3) violation of the Unruh Act; (4) violation of the Ralph Act; (5) violation of the Bane Act; (6) assault; (7) negligence; and (8) intentional infliction of emotional distress.

 

            Now, Defendants move to strike portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint.

 

Legal Standard

 

Motions to strike are used to reach defects or objections to pleadings that are not challengeable by demurrer, such as words, phrases, and prayers for damages. (See Code Civ Proc., §§ 435-437.)  A motion to strike can be made to strike irrelevant, false or improper matter inserted in any pleading or to strike any pleading or part thereof not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule or order of the court.  (CCP § 436.) 

 

Discussion

 

            Defendants move to strike all of Plaintiff’s allegations related to its claim for punitive damages.

 

The adequacy of a claim for punitive damages is properly tested by a motion to strike. (Grieves v. Superior Court (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 159, 164.) Civil Code section 3294, subdivision (a) authorizes the recovery of punitive damages where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, express or implied. Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (c)(1).) Oppression is despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person’s rights. (Id.subd. (c)(2).) Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the party of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. (Id.subd. (c)(3).) 

 

“In order to survive a motion to strike an allegation of punitive damages, the ultimate facts showing an entitlement to such relief must be pled by a plaintiff.” (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal. App. 4th 1253, 1255.) Conclusory allegations, devoid of any factual assertions, are insufficient to support a conclusion that parties acted with oppression, fraud or malice. (Smith v. Sup. Ct. (1992) 10 Cal. App. 4th 1033, 1042.)

 

Defendants argue that Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts that could show malice, oppression, or fraud.

 

However, Defendants have not challenged the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s allegations to state a claim.  Given that Plaintiff alleges conduct ranging from defamation, violations of the Unruh, Bane, and Ralph Acts, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Plaintiff has alleged facts which could show that defendant acted with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (c)(1).)

 

            Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ motion to strike is denied.

 

 

It is so ordered.

 

Dated:  February    , 2024

                                                                                                                                                          

   Hon. Jon R. Takasugi
   Judge of the Superior Court

 

 

 

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.  If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order.  If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517.