Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 24STCV06633, Date: 2024-07-29 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 24STCV06633    Hearing Date: July 29, 2024    Dept: 17

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 17

 

TENTATIVE RULING

 

MIGUEL ESPARZA, et al.

 

         vs.

 

ADVANCED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SPRAY DEPOT, LLC dba SPRAYERDEPOT.COM, et al.

 

 Case No.:  24STCV06633  

 

 

 

 Hearing Date:  July 29, 2024

 

Defendant’s demurrer is OVERRULED.

 

            On 3/18/2024, Plaintiff Miguel Esparaza (Plaintiff) filed suit against Advanced Systems Technology Spray Depot d/b/a Sprayerdepot.com alleging a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).

 

            Now, Defendant demurs to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

 

Factual Background

 

            Defendant sells sprayers, parts, and accessories to consumers across the country, and runs a website to facilitate these sales. As part of this website, Defendant includes a website chat feature. Plaintiff alleges that he visited Defendant’s website and conducted a brief conversation through the website chat feature. Plaintiff alleges that he was not advised that the chat was monitored, intercepted, or recorded.

 

Discussion

 

            Defendant argues that Plaintiff cannot state a claim for violation of CIPA because “Plaintiff ignores the vast majority of decisions holding that Penal Code Section 631(a) 1 does not apply to website chats; does not apply to communications not intercepted in transit; does not apply where the content of the communication is not at issue; and does not apply to communications recorded by a party to the communication or their agent.” (Demurrer, 3: 8-12.)

 

            However, by Defendant’s own admission, there is case law which has interpreted the alleged conduct here to fall within the scope of CIPA. The Court declines to determine at the pleading stage that there can be no violation of CIPA here. This is especially true given that such a determination will necessarily rely on factual determinations, such as whether or not the recording party has an interest in the content or meaning of the chats within the meaning of section 631.

 

            Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s demurrer is overruled. 

 

 

It is so ordered.

 

Dated:  July    , 2024

                                                                                                                                                          

   Hon. Jon R. Takasugi
   Judge of the Superior Court

 

 

 

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.  If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order.  If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517.