Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: 24STCV15762, Date: 2024-11-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV15762    Hearing Date: November 20, 2024    Dept: 17

Superior Court of California

County of Los Angeles

 

DEPARTMENT 17

 

TENATIVE RULING

 

SHARON RACHELLE CANO

 

         vs.

 

BRADLEY KRAMER, ESQ.

 

 Case No.:  24STCV15762

 

 

 Hearing Date:  November 20, 2024

 

            Defendant’s demurrer is SUSTAINED, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.

 

            On 6/24/2024, in propria persona Plaintiff Sharon Rachelle Cano, individually and as trustee of the Lorraine E. Cano Trust (Plaintiff) filed suit against Bradley Kramer, Esq. (Defendant) alleging: (1) breach of contract; and (2) legal malpractice.

 

            Now, Defendant demurs to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

 

Factual Background

 

            Plaintiff’s Complaint arises based on legal services performed by Defendant on behalf of Plaintiff’s mother, Lorraine. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant wrongfully dismissed her mother’s action for medical malpractice with prejudice, and that “Plaintiff is now in a position to lose her ability to recover from the Doctors for their part in the death of Lorraine.” (Complaint 16.)

 

Discussion

 

            Defendant argues that Plaintiff cannot state a claim against him because Defendant was not in a contract with either Plaintiff individually or on behalf of the Lorraine E. Cano Trust, and thus Plaintiff does not have standing here.

 

            The Court agrees. (CCP § 367; Probate Code § 9820(a).)

 

            Moreover, even setting aside the issue of standing, Plaintiff alleges that on 6/12/2023, she learned that her mother’s Complaint was dismissed. CCP Section 340.6 provides:

 

An action against an attorney for a wrongful act or omission, other than for actual fraud, arising in the performance of professional services shall be commenced within one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the wrongful act or omission, or four years from the date of the wrongful act or omission, whichever occurs first.

 

            As such, assuming Plaintiff had standing, Plaintiff would have had one year from 6/12/2023 to file this action. Plaintiff did not file until 6/21/2024, more than a year after learning the facts relating to the allegedly wrongful act or omission.

 

            Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s demurrer is sustained, without leave to amend.

 

            It is so ordered.

 

Dated:  November    , 2024

                                                                                                                                                          

   Hon. Jon R. Takasugi
   Judge of the Superior Court

 

 

 

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.  If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative.  If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order.  If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.  For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517.