Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: BC691142, Date: 2022-10-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC691142 Hearing Date: October 7, 2022 Dept: 17
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE
RULING
|
WAYNE BRENT, et al. vs. FAIROOZ KABBINAVAR, et al. |
Case No.: BC691142 Hearing Date: October 7, 2022 |
Defendants’
demurrer is SUSTAINED, WITH 15 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND. Defendants’ motion to
strike is GRANTED, WITH 15 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND.
On
1/24/2018, Wayne Brent by and though his surviving spouse and successor in
interest Najila K. Brent and Najila K. Brent individually filed this action
asserting 30 causes of action.
Despite
entering into a stipulation on 9/21/2021 to file a FAC, Plaintiffs have
yet to file a FAC.
Now,
Defendants Fairooz Kabbinavar, MD, Chinsuk Kim, NP, Jenny J. Kim, MD, the
Regents of the University of California, Paul Watkins, Administrator, Manuel
Eskildsen, M.D., and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Foundation/UCLA
(collectively, Defendants) demur to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Defendants also move
to strike portions of the Complaint.
The
motions are unopposed.
Discussion
Defendants
argue that Plaintiffs’ Complaint is fatally uncertain and fails to state a
claim as to all causes of action.
The
Court agrees. Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges the same extended paragraph to
support each cause of action. This makes it nearly impossible to tell what
specific acts are being alleged and by whom, and which allegations correspond
to the 30 different causes of action. Moreover, many of the causes of action do
not correspond to any underlying alleged act. For example, Plaintiffs assert a
cause of action for defamation despite there being no indication in the
Complaint as to whether a statement was published, what statement was published,
and specifically by whom.
Plaintiffs
must file an updated Complaint which makes clear what conduct by which
Defendants is being alleged to support which specific causes of action.
Motion to Strike
Defendants
argue that Plaintiffs have not alleged facts to support a punitive damages
prayer against them, and even if they had, punitive damages are not recoverable
from these Defendants pursuant to Government code section 818.
Pursuant to
Government Code Section 818: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a
public entity is not liable for damages awarded under Section 3294 of the Civil
Code or other damages imposed primarily for the sake of example and by way of
punishing the defendant.” The Regents of the University of California is a
Constitutional corporation established under Article IX, Section 9 of the
California Constitution and as such is a public entity
Plaintiffs
filed no opposition, and thus are considered to have conceded to Defendants’
argument on the merits.
Defendants’
motion to strike is granted with 15 days leave to amend,
It is so ordered.
Dated: October
, 2022
Hon. Jon R.
Takasugi
Judge of the
Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must
send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org. If a party submits
on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must
identify the party submitting on the tentative.
If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this
tentative as the final order. If the department
does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the
tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed
off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the court is
strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.