Judge: Jon R. Takasugi, Case: BC691142, Date: 2022-12-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC691142 Hearing Date: December 14, 2022 Dept: 17
Superior
Court of California
County
of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT 17
TENTATIVE RULING
|
WAYNE
BRENT, et al. vs. FAIROOZ
KABBINAVAR, et al. |
Case No.: BC691142 Hearing
Date: December 14, 2022 |
Defendants
Regents of University of California’s and Dr. Fairooz Kabbinavar’s motions to
deem the truth of the matters specified in its RFAs (Set One) are GRANTED.
Plaintiffs and counsel are sanctioned, jointly and severally, $1,050 per
motion.
On 1/24/2018, Wayne Brent by and
though his surviving spouse and successor in interest Najila K. Brent and
Najila K. Brent individually filed this action asserting 30 causes of action.
On 10/10/2022, Plaintiffs filed an
FAC, alleging: (1) wrongful death; (2) gross negligence (3) hospital
negligence; (4) professional negligence; (5) medical negligence; (6) medical
battery; (7) breach of fiduciary duty; (8) fraud; (9) intentional infliction of
emotional distress; (10) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (11)
survival action; (12) elder abuse; (13) public entity’s liability; and (14)
civil conspiracy to commit fraud, deceit, and conceal.
Now, Defendants Regents of
University of California and Dr. Fairooz Kabbinavar separately move to have
their Requests for Admissions (RFAs) deemed admitted.
I.
Regents of University of California’s Motion
Defendant served Plaintiffs with RFAs on 2/25/2022. (Vogt
Decl., Exh.A.) After multiple extensions, and in light of the fact that no
amended Complaint had been filed, counsel for Defendant agreed to re-issue
discovery at a later date. On 7/25/2022, Defendant served the same RFAs on
Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs again requested, and received, repeated extensions.
As such, Plaintiffs have had over three months by which to
prepare responses to discovery (and over 8 months if calculated from the
initial service date in February 2022). To date, no responses have been
received.
Plaintiffs did not oppose this motion, and thus have set
forth any substantial justification for this failure.
Defendant’s
motion is granted to deem the truth of the matters specified in its RFAs (Set
One) as admitted. Plaintiffs and counsel are sanctioned, jointly and severally,
$1,050. ($350/hr x 3/hr.)
II.
Dr. Fairooz Kabbinavar’s Motion
Defendant served Plaintiffs with RFAs on 2/25/2022. (Vogt
Decl., Exh.A.) After multiple extensions, and in light of the fact that no
amended Complaint had been filed, counsel for Defendant agreed to re-issue
discovery at a later date. On 7/25/2022, Defendant served the same RFAs on
Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs again requested, and received, repeated extensions.
As such, Plaintiffs have had over three months by which to
prepare responses to discovery (and over 8 months if calculated from the
initial service date in February 2022). To date, no responses have been
received.
Plaintiffs did not oppose this motion, and thus have set
forth any substantial justification for this failure.
Defendant’s
motion is granted to deem the truth of the matters specified in its RFAs (Set
One) as admitted. Plaintiffs and counsel are sanctioned, jointly and severally,
$1,050. ($350/hr x 3/hr.)
It is so
ordered.
Dated:
December , 2022
Hon. Jon R. Takasugi
Judge of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on
this tentative must send an email to the court at smcdept17@lacourt.org
by 4 p.m. the day prior as directed by the instructions provided on the court
website at www.lacourt.org.
If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case
number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If all parties to a motion
submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email
indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.
Due to Covid-19, the
court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances. Parties, counsel, and court reporters present
are subject to temperature checks and health inquiries, and will be denied
entry if admission could create a public health risk. The court encourages the parties wishing to
argue to appear via L.A. Court Connect.
For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213)
633-0517. Your understanding during
these difficult times is appreciated.