Judge: Joseph Lipner, Case: 23STCV03391, Date: 2023-09-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV03391 Hearing Date: September 13, 2023 Dept: 72
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT 72
TENTATIVE RULING
| 
   GLASSWERKS LA, INC.,                                   Plaintiff,             v. CENTURY SHOWER DOOR CO, INC. dba CENTURY SHOWER DOOR, a
  corporation, et al.,                                   Defendants.    | 
  
    Case No:  23STCV03391    Hearing Date: September
  13, 2023  Calendar
  Number:  3  | 
 
Plaintiff Glasswerks LA, Inc. filed a request
for entry of default judgment against Defendant Century Shower Door Co, Inc.
dba Century Shower Door, a corporation. 
Plaintiff Glasswerks
LA, Inc.’s request for entry of default judgment against Defendant Century Shower Door Co, Inc. dba Century Shower
Door, a corporation is GRANTED. 
Background
On February 15, 2023, Plaintiff Glasswerks LA,
Inc. (Plaintiff) filed a complaint against Defendant Century Shower Door, Co,
Inc. dba Century Shower Door, a corporation (Defendant), and DOES I through XX,
inclusive, alleging causes of action for (1) breach of written contract and (2)
breach of contract – Commercial Code § 2201. 
On March 14, 2023, Plaintiff filed proof of
service by mail indicating that the summons and complaint were served on
Defendant on February 23, 2023. Plaintiff also filed proof of service by
substitute service indicating that John Doe – Person Apparently in Charge was
served on behalf of Defendant. 
            On
April 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default. On the same day,
this Court entered default against Defendant. (Min. Order 4/19/23.) 
Legal Standard
 
Pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1800(a), “a party
seeking a default judgment on declarations must use mandatory Request for
Entry of Default (Application to Enter Default) (form CIV-100)…the
following must be included in the documents filed with the clerk: (1) except in
unlawful detainer cases, a brief summary of the case identifying the parties
and the nature of the plaintiffs claim; (2) declarations or other admissible
evidence in support of the judgment requested; (3) interest computations as necessary;
(4) a memorandum of costs and disbursements; (5) a declaration of nonmilitary
status for each defendant against whom judgment is sought; (6) a proposed form
of judgment; (7) a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought
or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under code of
Civil Procedure section 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each
judgment; (8) exhibits as necessary; and (9) a request for attorney fees if
allowed by statute or by the agreement of the parties.”
Pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5(a)(1), items are
allowable as costs under Section 1032 if they are “filing, motion, and jury
fees.”
Discussion
Here, Plaintiff Glasswerks LA, Inc. filed a
request for entry of default judgment on April 21, 2023. Plaintiff requests a
judgment of $101,595.28, consisting of (1) $83,353.28 in damages; (2)
$14,895.00 in prejudgment interest; (3) $536.54 in costs; and (4) $2,810.46 in
attorneys’ fees. 
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s default
judgment package and finds that granting default judgment is warranted under
law for the following reasons:
·       
Plaintiff used the
mandatory CIV-100 form. 
·       
Item #2 of the CIV-100
form is properly filled out with the amount of damages, prejudgment interest,
costs, and attorneys’ fees being requested.
·       
 Item #7 of the CIV-100 form consists of
memorandum of costs that are allowable under CCP § 1033.5(a)(1). 
·       
Item #8 of the CIV-100
form properly declares the Defendant’s nonmilitary status. 
·       
Plaintiff filed a
separate memorandum of points and authorities that briefly summarizes the
instant case and includes a computation of interest.
·       
Plaintiff filed a
proposed form of judgment using the JUD-100 form.
·       
Plaintiff filed a request
for dismissal properly dismissing DOES I through XX. 
·       
Plaintiff filed a
declaration from their custodian of records with exhibits attached to support
its request for damages. 
The Court therefore GRANTS
Plaintiff’s request for default judgment against Defendant Century Shower Door, Co,
Inc. dba Century Shower Door, a corporation.