Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 19STCV12706, Date: 2023-01-09 Tentative Ruling
If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 25 at the Spring Street Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is SSCdept25@lacourt.org. The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. Please note, the above e-mail address is to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.
Due to overcrowding concerns of COVID-19, all parties shall make every effort to schedule a remote appearance via LACourtConnect (https://my.lacourt.org/laccwelcome) for their next hearing. The parties shall register with LACourtConnect at least 2 hours prior to their scheduled hearing time. **Please note we no longer use CourtCall**
Case Number: 19STCV12706 Hearing Date: January 9, 2023 Dept: 25
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO SET ASIDE/VACATE DISMISSAL
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff
Scott L. Bennett, in propria persona
RESP. PARTY: None
MOTION TO SET ASIDE/VACATE DISMISSAL
(CCP § 473(b))
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiff Scott L. Bennett’s Motion
to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal is GRANTED.
Dismissal entered on September 14, 2022, is hereby VACATED.
SERVICE:
[
] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule
3.1300) OK
[ ]
Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) OK
[
] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) OK
OPPOSITION: None filed as of January 4,
2023. [ ] Late [X]
None
REPLY: None filed as
of January 4, 2023. [ ] Late [X] None
ANALYSIS:
I.
Background
On April 12, 2019, Plaintiff Scott
L. Bennett (“Plaintiff”), in propria persona, filed an action against
Defendants Luis Hernandez (“Luis”), Damien Hernandez, a minor (“Damien”), John
Koutsoukos (“John”), and “Jane Doe” Koutsoukos (“Jane Doe”), (collectively
“Defendants”), for breach of contract, common counts, fraud, and conversion.
On
September 9, 2019, the case was reclassified from civil unlimited to civil
limited jurisdiction. (9-9-19 Notice of
Reclassification, Notice of Case Reassignment, Minute Order.)
On
September 21, 2020, Defendant John Koutsoukos filed an Answer to the Complaint.
On
September 23, 2020, based on Plaintiff’s request, the Court entered default
against Defendant “Jane Doe” Koutsoukos.
(9-23-20 Request for Entry of Default/Judgment.)
On August
10, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel Responses to Demand
for Production of Documents and Special Interrogatories, filed on June 16,
2021. (8-10-21 Minute Order.) The Court ordered Defendant John to serve
verified responses without objections within thirty (30) days’ notice of the
Court order and to pay sanctions in the amount of $89.00. (Ibid.)
On January
12, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Continuance of
Trial and continued the trial date to March 15, 2022. (1-12-22 Minute Order.)
On March
15, 2022, on the date set for Non-Jury Trial, the Court noted that no
appearances were entered for Plaintiff and dismissed the Complaint without
prejudice. (3-15-22 Minute Order.)
On March
21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal. On April 18, 2022, the Court granted
Plaintiff’s Motion and ordered the dismissal entered on March 15, 2022, as to
the entire action, to be set aside and vacated.
(4-18-22 Minute Order.) On the
same day, the Court dismissed Defendants Luis and Damien without
prejudice. (Ibid.)
On
September 12, 2022, Defendant John filed a Motion to Dismiss Action for Lack of
Enforceability; however, no hearing date was reserved by the Defendant.
On
September 14, 2022, on the date set for Non-Jury Trial, the Court noted that
there were no appearances entered by Plaintiff and dismissed the Complaint
without prejudice. (9-14-22 Minute
Order.)
On October
28, 2022, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal.
On November
30, 2022, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to give Plaintiff an
opportunity to file a corrected Notice of Motion containing the name and
address of the courthouse where the hearing on the Motion will be held. (11-30-22 Minute Order.)
On December
30, 2022, Plaintiff filed a corrected Notice of Motion listing the Spring
Street Courthouse address as location of the hearing.
No
opposition has been filed.
II.
Legal Standard
Pursuant to Code
of Civil Procedure §473(b), both discretionary and mandatory relief is
available to parties when a case is dismissed.
Discretionary relief is available under the statute as “the court may,
upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal
representative from judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken
against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect. (Code of Civ. Proc. §
473(b).) Alternatively, mandatory relief
is available when “accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his
or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” (Ibid.) Under this statute, an application for
discretionary or mandatory relief must be made no more than six months after
entry of the judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding from which relief
is sought. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(b); English v. IKON Business Solutions
(2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.)
“‘[W]hen relief
under section 473¿is¿available, there is a strong¿public¿policy¿in¿favor¿of
granting relief and allowing the requesting party his or her day in
court…[Citation.]” (Rappleyea v. Campbell¿(1994) 8 Cal. 4th 975,
981-82.)
III.
Discussion
On September 14,
2022, on the date set for Non-Jury Trial, the Court noted that no appearances
had been entered by Plaintiff and dismissed the Complaint without prejudice. (9-14-22 Minute Order.)
On
October 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Set Aside/Vacate
Dismissal. Plaintiff seeks to set aside
dismissal of the Complaint on the ground that dismissal was entered because he
was late to the hearing “due to circumstances beyond his control.” (Mot. p. 3.)
Specifically, Plaintiff states that his girlfriend had tested positive
for COVID-19, so on the morning of the trial date and prior to heading to the
courthouse, Plaintiff went to an urgent care to check whether he had contracted
the virus. (Bennett Decl. ¶ 5.) The test result took additional time, so
Plaintiff was late to the hearing and thus, the case was dismissed. (Ibid.) Plaintiff has attached a copy of the test
results indicating that he went to the urgent care the morning of the
hearing. (Bennett Decl., Ex. A.)
On November 30, 2022, the Court noted
that Plaintiff’s motion is timely, as it was filed within six months after the
entry of dismissal on September 14, 2022.
(11-30-22 Minute Order.) However,
the Court continued the hearing on the Motion as the Notice did not indicate
the address or name of the courthouse where the hearing on the Motion will take
place. (Ibid.)
On December
30, 2022, Plaintiff filed a corrected Notice of Motion listing the Spring
Street Courthouse address as location of the hearing.
The Court
finds that Plaintiff’s failure to appear can be attributed to excusable neglect
and the Court has authority to set aside dismissal entered on September 14,
2022. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion is
GRANTED.
IV.
Conclusion
& Order
For the foregoing reasons,
Plaintiff Scott L. Bennett’s Motion
to Set Aside/Vacate Dismissal is GRANTED.
Dismissal entered on September 14, 2022, is hereby VACATED.
Trial is
hereby set for March 1, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 25, Spring Street
Courthouse. The parties are ordered to
comply with the Standing Order for Department 25 and to file their joint
exhibit and witness lists at least ten (10) days before trial.
Moving party is to give notice.