Judge Katherine Chilton, Case 19STLC02762 2022-12-06 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 19STLC02762, Date: 2022-12-06 Tentative Ruling

If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 25 at the Spring Street Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is SSCdept25@lacourt.org. The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. Please note, the above e-mail address is to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.
Due to overcrowding concerns of COVID-19, all parties shall make every effort to schedule a remote appearance via LACourtConnect (https://my.lacourt.org/laccwelcome) for their next hearing. The parties shall register with LACourtConnect at least 2 hours prior to their scheduled hearing time. **Please note we no longer use CourtCall**

Case Number: 19STLC02762 Hearing Date: December 6, 2022 Dept: 25

PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

MOVING PARTY: Counsel Jacob O. Partiyeli, for Plaintiff Moises Sanchez

RESP. PARTY: None

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

(CCP § 284, CRC rule 3.162)

TENTATIVE RULING:

Counsel Jacob O. Partiyeli’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel as to Plaintiff Moises Sanchez is CONTINUED to JANUARY 11, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 25 at Spring Street Courthouse. Counsel for Plaintiff is ordered to serve all parties in the case at least 16 court days before the scheduled hearing. Failure to do so may result in the hearing being placed off calendar or denied.

SERVICE:

[ ] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) YES

[ ] Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) YES

[ ] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) YES

OPPOSITION: None filed as of December 1, 2022 [ ] Late [X] None

REPLY: None filed as of December 1, 2022 [ ] Late [X] None

ANALYSIS:

I. Background

On March 20, 2019, Plaintiff Moises Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) filed an action against Defendant Sooyeol Kim (“Defendant”) for motor vehicle and general negligence arising from an accident between Plaintiff’s bicycle, on the one hand, and Defendant’s vehicle, on the other hand.

On December 10, 2020, Defendant filed a General Denial.

On July 6, 2022, after the case had been dismissed on March 17, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Dismissal and vacated the dismissal entered on March 17, 2022. (7-6-22 Minute Order.)

On July 25, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel, Jacob O. Partiyeli filed the instant Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. No opposition has been filed.

On October 31, 2022, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to allow Counsel an opportunity to serve all parties. (10-31-22 Minute Order.)

II. Legal Standard

Code of Civil Procedure § 284 states that “the attorney in an action…may be changed at any time before or after judgment or final determination, as follows: (1) upon the consent of both client and attorney…; (2) upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 284; CRC 3.1362.) The withdrawal request may be denied if it would cause an injustice or undue delay in proceeding; but the court's discretion in this area is one to be exercised reasonably. (See Mandell v. Superior (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1, 4; Lempert v. Superior Court (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1173.)

In making a motion to be relieved as counsel, the attorney must comply with procedures set forth in Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362. The motion must be made using mandatory forms:

1. Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel directed to the client – (MC-051);

2. Declaration “stating in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship” the reasons that the motion was brought (MC-052);

3. Proposed Order (MC-053).

(Ibid.) The forms must be timely filed and served on all parties who have appeared in the case. (Ibid.) If these documents are served on the client by mail, there must be a declaration stating either that the address where client was served is “the current residence or business address of the client” or “the last known residence or business address of the client and the attorney has been unable to locate a more current address after making reasonable efforts to do so within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d)(1).)

III. Discussion

On July 25, 2022, Counsel Jacob O. Partiyeli (“Partiyeli”) moved the Court to relieve him as attorney of record for Plaintiff Moises Sanchez.

On October 31, 2022, the Court found that Counsel properly filed a Notice of Motion and Motion (MC-051), Declaration in Support of the Motion (MC-052) providing a proper reason for the withdrawal, and a Proposed Order, Form MC-053. (10-31-22 Minute Order.) The Court also noted that there was no showing that withdrawal would cause injustice or undue delay in the proceedings. (Ibid.)

Counsel filed proof that all documents were served on Plaintiff on July 21, 2022, at his last known address, which Counsel confirmed with Plaintiff’s neighbor within the past 30 days. (Ibid.; MC-051, p. 3; MC-052 ¶ 3.)

However, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion because Counsel had not served all parties, in violation of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, which requires moving papers to be “served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case.” (10-31-22 Minute Order.)

To date, Counsel has not filed proof that all parties have been served. For this reason, the Court continues the hearing on the Motion one final time. Counsel is ordered to serve all parties with the moving papers. Counsel is also ordered to serve all parties with a Notice of Continuance of the hearing.

IV. Conclusion & Order

For the foregoing reasons,

Moving party is ordered to give notice.