Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 20STLC09357, Date: 2023-04-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STLC09357 Hearing Date: April 25, 2023 Dept: 25
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiffs
Augustin Soriano and Ana Galdamez
RESP. PARTY: None
MOTION TO SET VACATE DISMISSAL
(CCP § 473(b))
TENTATIVE RULING:
Plaintiffs
Augustin Soriano and Ana
Galdamez’s Motion to Vacate Dismissal of Case GRANTED. Dismissal entered on December 1, 2022 is
hereby VACATED.
SERVICE:
[
] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule
3.1300) OK
[ ]
Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) OK
[
] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) OK
OPPOSITION: None filed as of April 24,
2023. [ ] Late [X]
None
REPLY: None filed as
of April 24, 2023. [ ] Late [X] None
ANALYSIS:
I.
Background
On November 5, 2020, Plaintiffs
Augustin Soriano and Ana Galdamez (“Plaintiffs”) filed an action against
Defendant Anaia Skinner (“Defendant”), for motor vehicle and general
negligence.
Defendant
was substitute served on August 23, 2022 but no answer was filed. On December 1, 2022, an Order to Show Cause
re: Defendant’s Filing of An Answer or Entry of Default was scheduled. There was no appearance for either party so
the Court ordered the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs to be dismissed without
prejudice. (12-01-22 Minute Order).
On March 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed the
instant Motion for Order Vacating Dismissal (“Motion”). No opposition has been filed.
II.
Legal Standard
Pursuant to Code
of Civil Procedure §473(b), both discretionary and mandatory relief is
available to parties when a case is dismissed.
Discretionary relief is available under the statute as “the court may,
upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal
representative from judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken
against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect. (Code of Civ. Proc. §
473(b).) Alternatively, mandatory relief
is available when “accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to
his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” (Ibid.) Under this statute, an application for
discretionary or mandatory relief must be made no more than six months after
entry of the judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding from which relief
is sought. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(b); English v. IKON Business Solutions
(2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.)
“‘[W]hen relief
under section 473¿is¿available, there is a strong¿public¿policy¿in¿favor¿of
granting relief and allowing the requesting party his or her day in
court…[Citation.]” (Rappleyea v. Campbell¿(1994) 8 Cal. 4th 975,
981-82.)
III.
Discussion
On December 1, 2022, the date set
for an Order to Show Cause re: Filing of An Answer or Entry of Default, the
Court noted that no appearance was entered by Plaintiff and dismissed the
Complaint without prejudice. (12-01-22
Minute Order.)
On
March 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for An Order Vacating
Dismissal, seeking to set aside dismissal of the Complaint based on plaintiff’s
counsel’s affidavit of fault and “mistake, inadvertence, and excusable neglect.” (Mem. p. 1-2.) Specifically, Plaintiffs’ counsel “mistakenly
never calendared” the Order to Show Cause.
((Haralambopoulos Decl. ¶ 4).
The Court finds that Plaintiffs’
motion is timely and accompanied by an attorney’s declaration of fault. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED,
and dismissal entered on December 1, 2022 is vacated.
IV.
Conclusion
& Order
For the foregoing reasons,
Plaintiffs Augustin Soriano and Ana
Galdamez’s Motion for An Order Vacating Dismissal is GRANTED. Dismissal entered on December 1, 2022, is
hereby VACATED.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice to
Defendant’s counsel at CIGA. An Order to
Show Cause re: filing of answer or entry of default is set for June 22, 2023 at
9:30 a.m. in Department 25, Spring Street Courthouse.