Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 21STLC02721, Date: 2022-09-07 Tentative Ruling
If you desire to submit on the tentative ruling, you may do so by e-mailing Dept. 25 at the Spring Street Courthouse up until the morning of the motion hearing. The e-mail address is SSCdept25@lacourt.org. The heading on your e-mail should contain the case name, number, hearing date, and that you submit. The message should indicate your name, contact information, and the party you represent. Please note, the above e-mail address is to inform the court of your submission on the tentative ruling. All other inquiries will not receive a response.
Due to overcrowding concerns of COVID-19, all parties shall make every effort to schedule a remote appearance via LACourtConnect (https://my.lacourt.org/laccwelcome) for their next hearing. The parties shall register with LACourtConnect at least 2 hours prior to their scheduled hearing time. **Please note we no longer use CourtCall**
Case Number: 21STLC02721 Hearing Date: September 7, 2022 Dept: 25
PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
MOVING PARTY: Defendant
Kathy Kovesdi
RESP. PARTY: Plaintiff AG Arcadia, LLC
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
(CCP § 473)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant Kathy
Kovesdi’s Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and/or Default Judgment is
CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 10, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 25 at the SPRING
STREET COURTHOUSE. At least 16 court
days before the continued hearing, Defendant must file and serve supplemental
papers as requested herein. Failure to
do so will result in the Motion being placed off calendar or denied.
SERVICE:
[
] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule
3.1300) YES
[
] Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) YES
[
] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c,
1005(b)) YES
OPPOSITION: Filed on August 23, 2022. [ ] Late [ ] None
REPLY: Filed on
August 29, 2022. [ ] Late [ ] None
ANALYSIS:
I.
Background
On April 6, 2021, Plaintiff AG
Arcadia, LLC, dba Huntington Drive Health and Rehabilitation Center
(“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant Kathy Kovesdi (“Defendant”)
for breach of contract, common counts, and quantum meruit.
On July 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed
two Declarations of Due Diligence demonstrating an inability to serve
Defendant. Subsequently, Plaintiff
applied to serve Defendant by publication and the Court granted Plaintiff’s
request on October 26, 2021. On November
30, 2021, Plaintiff filed Proof of Publication.
Defendant did not file any
responsive pleadings, so on January 12, 2022, based on Plaintiff’s request, the
Court entered default against Defendant.
(1-12-22 Request for Entry of Default/Judgment.) Subsequently on April 8, 2022, default
judgment was entered against Defendant in the amount of $23,817.82. (4-8-22 Default Judgment.)
On July 26, 2022, Defendant Kathy
Kovesdi filed the instant Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and/or Default
Judgment (the “Motion”). Plaintiff filed
an opposition on August 23, 2022, and Defendant filed a Reply on August 29,
2022.
II.
Legal
Standard
Pursuant to Code
of Civil Procedure §473(b), both discretionary and mandatory relief is
available to parties from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding. Discretionary relief is available under the
statute as “the court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or
his or her legal representative from judgment, dismissal, order, or other
proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or excusable neglect. (Code of
Civ. Proc. § 473(b).)
Alternatively, mandatory relief is available when “accompanied by an
attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or neglect.” (Ibid.) Under this statute, an application for
discretionary or mandatory relief must be made no more than six months after
entry of the judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding from which relief
is sought. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(b); English v. IKON Business Solutions
(2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.)
“‘[W]hen relief
under section 473¿is¿available, there is a strong¿public¿policy¿in¿favor¿of
granting relief and allowing the requesting party his or her day in court…[Citation.]”
(Rappleyea v. Campbell¿(1994) 8 Cal. 4th 975, 981-82.)
III.
Discussion
Defendant seeks to set aside the default and default
judgment based on “excusable mistake.” (Mot. p. 6.)
Specifically, Defendant argues that she did not respond to the lawsuit
due to “mental confusion or illness” following a fall. (Ibid.)
As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that the
Defendant’s Notice of Motion is defective as it does not contain the address or
name of the courthouse where the hearing on the Motion will be held. The Court orders Defendant to serve and file
a Notice of Motion in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule
3.1110(b). For this reason, the hearing
on the Motion is CONTINUED.
IV.
Conclusion
& Order
Defendant Kathy
Kovesdi’s Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and/or Default Judgment is
CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 10, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 25 at the SPRING
STREET COURTHOUSE. At least 16 court
days before the continued hearing, Defendant must file and serve supplemental
papers as requested herein. Failure to
do so will result in the Motion being placed off calendar or denied.
Moving party to give notice.