Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 22STCP04186, Date: 2023-04-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP04186 Hearing Date: April 3, 2023 Dept: 25
PROCEEDINGS: PETITION
TO DECLARE MOBILEHOME ABANDONED
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner
Belmont Shores Mobile Estates
RESP. PARTY: None
PETITION TO DECLARE MOBILEHOME ABANDONED
(Civ. Code § 798.61)
TENTATIVE RULING:
Petitioner Belmont Shores Mobile
Estates’ unopposed Petition to Declare Mobilehome Abandoned is GRANTED. Petitioner is awarded $9,100.00 in
storage charges.
SERVICE:
[X]
Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK
[X]
Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) OK
[X]
16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) OK
OPPOSITION: None filed as of March 29,
2023. [ ] Late [X]
None
REPLY: None filed as
of March 29, 2023. [ ] Late [X] None
ANALYSIS:
I.
Background
On November 28, 2022, Petitioner Belmont Shores Mobile
Estates (“Petitioner”) filed the instant Petition to Declare Mobile Home
Abandoned (“Petition”) against Respondents Betty Allen (“Allen”) and Daniel
Pettis (“Pettis”) (collectively, “Respondents”). Pursuant to Civil Code § 798.61,
Petitioner seeks a declaration that the mobilehome located at 6239 Emerald Cove
Dr., Long Beach CA 90803, described as 1973 Homette, Decal Number AAM5667, Serial
No. 0372743U/0372743X (“Mobilehome”) is abandoned. (Pet. ¶ 5.)
Petitioner also seeks storage charges in the amount of $1,300.00 per
month owed from July 1, 2022. (Ibid.
at ¶ 6.)
No opposition has been filed. Default was entered against Defendants Allen
and Pettis on March 6, 2023. (3-6-23
Request for Entry of Default.)
II.
Legal
Standard & Discussion
A. Determination of “Abandoned Mobilehome”—Civ. Code § 798.61(a)(1)
Pursuant
to Civil Code § 798.61(a)(1), an “‘abandoned mobilehome’ means a mobilehome
about which all of the following are true:
(A) It is located in a mobilehome park
on a site for which no rent has been paid to the management for the preceding
60 days.
(B) It is unoccupied.
(C) A reasonable person would believe
it to be abandoned.
(D) It is not permanently affixed to
the land.”
Petitioner submits the declaration
of Sal Ortiz, Regional Manager for Petitioner Belmont Shores Mobile Estates
located at 6230 Marina Drive, Long Beach, CA 90803 (“Park”). (Ortiz Decl. ¶ 3.) According to Ortiz and the California
Department of Housing and Community Development, the agency responsible for
licensing and titling mobilehomes, Respondents Allen and Pettis are the
registered owners of the mobilehome located at 6239 Emerald Cove Dr., Long
Beach CA 90803, described as 1973 Homette, Decal Number AAM5667, Serial No.
0372743U/0372743X. (Ibid. at ¶ 4, Ex. 2.) There are no legal owners of the
mobilehome. (Ibid.)
Ortiz explains that to the best of his
knowledge and belief, the Mobilehome is unoccupied and was unoccupied prior to October
11[1],
2022. (Ibid. at ¶ 7.) The Mobilehome is not permanently affixed to
the space and is located in the Park on a site for which no rent or storage
fees have been paid since July 2022, 60 days preceding the posting of a Notice
of Belief of Abandonment (“Notice”) on the Mobilehome. (Ibid. at ¶¶ 7-8.) On October 11, 2022, the 30-day Notice was
posted on the Mobilehome. (Ibid.,
Ex. 1.)
The Court finds that
the Mobilehome falls within the Civil Code § 798.61’s definition of
“abandoned.”
B. Notice of Belief of Abandonment—Civ. Code § 798.61(b)
Civil Code § 798.61(b) requires:
“After
determining a mobilehome in a mobilehome park to be an abandoned mobilehome,
the management shall post a notice of belief of abandonment on the mobilehome
for not less than 30 days, and shall deposit copies of the notice in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the homeowner at the last known
address and to any known registered owner, if different from the homeowner, and
to any known holder of a security interest in the abandoned mobilehome. This notice shall be mailed by registered or
certified mail with a return receipt requested.”
On October 11, 2022, a 30-day Notice
of Belief of Abandonment was posted on the Mobilehome. (Ortiz Decl. ¶ 8, Ex. 1; 3-6-23 Proof of
Service – Trevillyan Decl. ¶ 2.) On the same
day, the Notice was mailed via certified mail, return receipt requested, to
Respondents at 6239 Emerald Cove Dr., Long Beach, CA 90803. (Ortiz Decl. ¶¶ 4, 8, Ex. 2; 3-6-23
Proof of Service – Trevillyan Decl. ¶¶ 2-3, pp. 3-5.)
The Court finds that Petitioner has
satisfied the requirements of § 798.61(b).
C. Petition for Judicial Declaration—Civ. Code § 798.61(c)
Civil Code § 798.61(c)(1) states:
“Thirty or more days following posting pursuant to
subdivision (b), the management may file a petition in the superior court in
the county in which the mobilehome park is located, for a judicial declaration
of abandonment of the mobilehome. A proceeding under this subdivision is a limited
civil case. Copies of the petition shall be served upon the homeowner, any
known registered owner, and any known person having a lien or security interest
of record in the mobilehome by posting a copy on the mobilehome and mailing
copies to those persons at their last known addresses by registered or
certified mail with a return receipt requested in the United States mail,
postage prepaid.”
On November 28, 2022, Petitioner filed
the instant Petition. Petitioner has
submitted proof that a copy of the Petition was served on Respondents Allen and
Pettis by posting a copy of the Petition at 6239 Emerald Cove Dr., Long Beach,
CA 90803, on December 1, 2022, and mailing the Petition to the same address via
certified mail, return receipt requested on November 28, 2022. (3-6-23 Proofs of Service by Posting.) The envelope sent to Respondent Allen was
returned as undeliverable. (Ibid.
at p. 3.)
The
Court finds the service requirements of § 798.61(c) have been satisfied.
D.
Charges,
Attorney’s Fees, and Costs
Civil Code section 798.61(d)(2) states:
“If, at the hearing, the petitioner shows by a
preponderance of the evidence that the criteria for an abandoned mobilehome has
been satisfied and no party establishes an interest therein at the hearing and
tenders all past due rent and other charges, the court shall enter a judgment
of abandonment, determine the amount of charges to which the petitioner is
entitled, and award attorney's fees and costs to the petitioner.”
Petitioner seeks monthly storage
charges of $1,300.00 per month for seven (7) months, from July 1, 2022, through
January 1, 2023. (Ortiz Decl. ¶ 9, Ex.
3.) The monthly charge is calculated
based on the amount of rent Respondent was paying for the space at the time the
Mobilehome was abandoned. (Ibid.) Petitioner argues that the amount requested
is reasonable because a similarly sized mobilehome would incur storage charges
of $77.50 per day in the City of Los Angles, totaling $2,325.00 per month. (Ibid. at ¶ 10.) The total amount of storage charges from July
1, 2022, through January 1, 2023, is calculated at $9,100. (Ibid. at ¶ 11.)
Petitioner seeks additional
attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $225.00. (Pet. p. 3; 3-6-23 Proposed Default
Judgment.) Petitioner, however, has not
provided support for the $225.00 in costs so the Court cannot award costs at
this time.
The Court finds the storage charges
requested to be reasonable. Petitioner’s
request is GRANTED. Petitioner is awarded a total of $9,100.00.
III.
Conclusion
& Order
For the foregoing reasons,
Petitioner Belmont Shores Mobile
Estates’ unopposed Petition to Declare Mobilehome Abandoned is GRANTED. Petitioner is awarded $9,100.00 in
storage charges.
Moving party is ordered to give
notice.
[1] The
declaration provides inconsistent dates regarding the date of posting stating
that the Notice was posted both on September 27, 2022, and October 11,
2022. However, the Notice itself is
dated October 10, 2022, thus the Court presumes that September 27, 2022, is a
typographical error.