Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 22STLC04767, Date: 2023-05-04 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STLC04767     Hearing Date: May 4, 2023    Dept: 25

PROCEEDINGS:      MOTION TO SET ASIDE/VACATE DEFAULT

 

MOVING PARTY:   Defendant George Loomis

RESP. PARTY:         None

 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE/VACATE DEFAULT

(CCP § 473(b))

 

TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Defendant George Loomis’s Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default is DENIED.

 

SERVICE: 

 

[   ] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300)                 NO

[   ] Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a)                                                 NO

[   ] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b))                    

 

OPPOSITION:          None filed as of May 3, 2023.               [   ] Late                      [X] None

REPLY:                     None filed as of May 3, 2023.               [   ] Late                      [X] None

 

ANALYSIS:

 

I.                Background

 

On July 19, 2022, Plaintiff David Hradec (“Plaintiff”), in propria persona, filed an action against Defendant George Loomis (“Defendant”) arising out of an alleged breach of contract.

 

On September 6, 2022, Plaintiff filed Proof of Service by Substituted Service indicating that Defendant had been served on July 26, 2022.  (09-06-22 Proof of Service.)

 

On September 22, 2022, pursuant to Plaintiff’s request, the Court entered default against Defendant.  (09-22-22 Request for Entry of Default/Judgment.) 

 

            On March 30, 2023, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default (“Motion”).

 

            No opposition has been filed.

 

II.              Legal Standard

 

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §473(b), both discretionary and mandatory relief is available to parties from “judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her.”  Discretionary relief is available under the statute as “the court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.  (Code of Civ. Proc. § 473(b).)  Alternatively, mandatory relief is available when “accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.”  (Ibid.)  Under this statute, an application for discretionary or mandatory relief must be made no more than six months after entry of the judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding from which relief is sought.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 473(b); English v. IKON Business Solutions (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 143.)

 

“‘[W]hen relief under section 473¿is¿available, there is a strong¿public¿policy¿in¿favor¿of granting relief and allowing the requesting party his or her day in court…[Citation.]” (Rappleyea v. Campbell¿(1994) 8 Cal. 4th 975, 981-82.)

 

Furthermore, “[a]pplication for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein.”  (Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b).)

 

III.            Discussion

 

On March 30, 2023, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default.  Defendant seeks to set aside default based on the fact that “the loan in question was to my feature film “Unthinkable” and never for personal use in any way.”  Defendant does not cite a code section to support his argument nor does he provide any facts to show that the default was entered due to his “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Indeed, Defendant does not cite any reason to set aside the default.   As California Rule of Court 3.1113 states, “[a] party filing a motion . . . must serve and file a supporting memorandum.  The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion . . . is not meritorious and cause for its denial . . . .”  Defendant’s failure to submit any authority or argument allows the Court to find that the Motion is not meritorious.  Furthermore, there is no evidence that Defendant gave notice to Plaintiff.

           

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

 

IV.           Conclusion & Order

 

For the foregoing reasons,

 

Defendant George Loomis’s Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default is DENIED.

 

Moving party is to give notice.