Judge: Katherine Chilton, Case: 22STLC08470, Date: 2023-03-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STLC08470 Hearing Date: March 14, 2023 Dept: 25
PROCEEDINGS: DEMURRER
WITH MOTION TO STRIKE
MOVING PARTY: Defendant
PPG Industries, Inc.
RESP. PARTY: None
DEMURRER WITH MOTION TO STRIKE
(CCP §§ 430.10, 435 et seq.)
TENTATIVE RULING:
The Demurrer with Motion to Strike
filed by Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. is PLACED OFF CALENDAR.
On the Court’s own motion, the action is RECLASSIFIED as an
unlimited jurisdiction case and transferred to the transfer/reclassification
desk in Department 1 for review and reassignment.
SERVICE:
[X]
Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK
[X]
Correct Address (CCP §§ 1013, 1013a) OK
[X]
16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP §§ 12c, 1005(b)) OK
OPPOSITION: None filed as of March 9,
2023. [ ] Late [X] None
REPLY: None filed as
of March 9, 2023. [ ]
Late [X] None
ANALYSIS:
I.
Background
On December 20, 2022, Plaintiff Ben
Shahbaz (“Plaintiff”), in propria persona, filed an action against Defendant
PPG. (“Defendant”) for violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law
(Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq., violation of California’s
Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq.), quasicontractual
restitution and unjust enrichment, and negligence. (Compl. p. 1.) Plaintiff makes the following request for
relief: (1) award of actual damages and any other form of monetary relief
allowed by law, (2) punitive damages, (3) award for restitution, (4) award for
disgorgement, restitution, and other equitable relief as the Court deems proper,
(5) prejudgment and post-judgment interest as allowed under law, (6) reasonable
attorney’s fees and costs, and (7) any other relief the Court may deem just and
proper. (Compl. pp. 10-11.)
On February 10, 2023, Defendant PPG
Industries, Inc. (erroneously sued as PPG.) filed the instant Demurrer with
Motion to Strike. On March 7, 2023,
Defendant filed Notice of Non-Opposition to Demurrer with Motion to Strike. No opposition has been filed.
II.
Legal
Standard & Discussion
Before addressing the merits of
the Demurrer, the Court notes that the remedies sought by Plaintiff are not the
type of relief that a limited jurisdiction court, such as this one, can
grant. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 85, 86.) Plaintiff seeks equitable relief; however,
the availability of equitable relief in a limited civil case is restricted by
Code of Civil Procedure § 86(b).
The Court finds this case was
incorrectly classified as a limited jurisdiction action. Accordingly, the Court
reclassifies this action to unlimited jurisdiction court on its own motion
under Code of Civil Procedure § 403.040(a).
As Plaintiff was granted a fee waiver, no reclassification fee is
required.
Accordingly, the matter is transferred to
Department 1 for reassignment.
III.
Conclusion & Order
For the foregoing reasons,
The Demurrer with Motion to Strike
filed by Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. is PLACED OFF CALENDAR. On the
Court’s own motion, the action is RECLASSIFIED as an unlimited jurisdiction
case and is transferred to the transfer/reclassification desk in Department 1
for review and reassignment.
Moving party is ordered to give
notice.