Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 19STCV07475, Date: 2023-03-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV07475 Hearing Date: March 14, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiffs, vs.
MARISELA
ORTEGA ROBLES, et al.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Dept.
27 8:30
a.m. March
14, 2023 |
On March 4, 2019, Jonathan Maldonado
(“Maldonado”) and Korinna Trejo (“Trejo”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed
this action against Marisela Ortega Robles (“Robles”), Elizabeth Guzman Alonso (“Alonso”),
and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, arising from an April 15, 2018 motor vehicle
collision. In the complaint, Plaintiffs
allege that Maldonado operated a vehicle owned by Trejo that was involved in a collision
on the day of the incident. Because of
the collision, the vehicle was disabled in the number 1 lane of the southbound I-710
freeway with the emergency blinkers turned on.
Maldonado was standing in front of the vehicle inspecting the damage
when Alonso rear-ended Trejo’s disabled vehicle and caused it to catapult
forward and strike Maldonado. Maldonado
sustained severe injuries, including the amputation of his right leg.
On April 22, 2019, Plaintiffs filed
proof of service of the summons and complaint on Alonso.
On November 20, 2020, Plaintiffs filed
proof of service of the Statement of Damages on Alonso.
On March 24, 2021, the Clerk of the
Court entered default against Alonso.
On November 23, 2021, the Clerk of the
Court entered dismissal against Does 1 through 100.
Plaintiffs now request entry of default
judgment against Alonso in the amount of $9,985,714.15 consisting of $9,985,000.00
in general damages and $701.15 in costs.
Plaintiffs’ application for entry of
default judgment is deficient for the following reasons:
·
The
proposed judgment does not name any defendant in Item 5(a).
·
Although
the Declaration of William H. Newkirk states that Alonso was not in the Armed
Services of the United States at the time of the subject incident, the declaration
of nonmilitary status in Item 8 of Judicial Council Form CIV-100 does not
properly refer to Alonso. Alonso is
named in Item 1(d) of Form CIV-100. Item
8 refers to unnamed defendants in Item 1(c).
·
Plaintiff
Maldonado does not substantiate the request for general damages. In his declaration, Maldonado requests a
court judgment in the principal sum of $9,985,000 because his life expectancy
of 50 years is reasonable and payment of $200,000 a year to compensate his pain
and suffering is more than reasonable. (Maldonado
Decl., ¶¶ 10-11.) However, Plaintiff does not explain further or
substantiate the basis for a general damages award of $9,985,000.[1]
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ application
for Entry of Default Judgment against Alonso is DENIED without prejudice. On the Court’s own motion, the Court sets an
OSC re: Failure to File Default Judgment for May 15, 2023 at 8:30 a.m. in
Department 27 of Spring Street Courthouse.
Plaintiffs are to re-file all materials in support of their default
judgment application at least 10 days before the hearing.
The Clerk is to give notice to counsel
for Plaintiffs, who is to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 14th day of March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|
[1] Counsel has
not submitted a request for special damages.
To assist the court in determining general damages, counsel should provide
the court with reference information to substantiate the amount sought, such as
actuarial figures or national/California settlement averages for loss of
limb/leg and adjust the requested amount to account for the pertinent facts of
the case.