Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 19STCV33198, Date: 2023-05-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV33198 Hearing Date: May 16, 2023 Dept: 27
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 27
HEARING DATE: May
16, 2023 TRIAL
DATE: July 25, 2023
CASE: Gavriela Sandoval v. Robert Dunn, et al.
CASE NO.: 19STCV33198
MOTION
TO CONTINUE TRIAL
MOVING PARTY: Defendant
Robert Dunn
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
I. BACKGROUND
On September 17, 2019, Plaintiff Gavriela Sandoval filed
this action against defendant Robert Dunn (“Defendant”) arising from a dog bite
by a German Shepherd. On July 30, 2020,
Plaintiff added Cory Perbix as a defendant. Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended
Complaint on April 30, 2021.
On April 24, 2023, Defendant filed this motion to continue
the trial date so that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment may be heard on
its presently reserved hearing date of June 29, 2023. Defendant does not request that discovery and
motion cut-off dates be set to a new trial date. This is the fourth request for a trial
continuance in this case.
The motion is unopposed.
II. LEGAL STANDARDS
A.
Motion to Continue Trial
California Rules of Court, rule
3.1332, subdivision (b) outlines that “a party seeking a continuance of the
date set for trial, whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the
parties, must make the request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex
parte application under the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with
supporting declarations. The party must make the motion or application as
soon as reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is
discovered.”
Under California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1332, subd. (c), the Court may grant a continuance only on an
affirmative showing of good cause requiring the continuance. Circumstances that may indicate good cause
include “a party's excused inability to obtain essential testimony, documents,
or other material evidence despite diligent efforts.” The Court should
consider all facts and circumstances relevant to the determination, such as
proximity of the trial date, prior continuances, prejudice suffered, whether
all parties have stipulated to a continuance, and whether the interests of
justice are served. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1332, subd. (d).)
B.
Deadlines for Summary Judgment Motion
Code of Civil Procedure, section
437c requires a Motion for Summary Judgment be made any time after 60 days have
elapsed since the general appearance in the action.¿ The motion shall be heard
no later than 30 days before trial, unless the Court, for good cause, orders
otherwise.¿ Parties must serve notice of the motion and all supporting papers at
least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing.¿
III. DISCUSSION
Defendant argues good cause exists to continue the trial because
Defendant reserved the earliest available hearing date for a motion for summary
judgment. The motion is scheduled for
June 29, 2023, which is less than 30 days before trial. Trial is currently scheduled for July 25,
2023. (Spivey Decl.)¿ Defendant requests
a trial continuance so that his summary judgment motion may be heard in
compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 437c.
Based on the foregoing, the Court finds there is good cause for
a trial continuance. As there is no
opposition to the request, no prejudice will result from a trial continuance. All parties have been served with notice of this
motion.
IV. CONCLUSION
The motion to continue trial is GRANTED. Defendant’s
motion for summary judgment is scheduled for June 29, 2023. The Final Status Conference scheduled for July
11, 2023, is CONTINUED to July 17, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 27 of the
Spring Street Courthouse, and the Non-Jury Trial scheduled for July 25, 2023 is
CONTINUED to July 31, 2023 at 08:30 a.m. in Department 27 of the Spring Street
Courthouse. All discovery cut-off dates,
all pretrial deadlines including discovery, expert, and motion cut-off dates remain
set to the date of July 25, 2023.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated: May 16, 2023 ___________________________________
Kerry
Bensinger
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on
the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear
at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and
argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all other parties
in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to
argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating
submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final
order or place the motion off calendar.