Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 20STCV07479, Date: 2023-03-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV07479 Hearing Date: March 28, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs.
VIA
MARINA TAHITI HOA, et al.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT PERSONAL TOUCH CLEANING & MAINTENANCE, INC.’S MOTION TO
CONTINUE TRIAL OR TO SPECIALLY SET HEARING Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. March
28, 2023 |
I.
INTRODUCTION
On February 18, 2020, plaintiff Nakisa Nowzar (“Plaintiff”),
filed this action against defendants Via Marina Tahiti HOA, Horizon Management
Company, and Does 1 to 100 for injuries arising from a slip and fall on April
4, 2018. On October 29, 2020, Plaintiff
added Personal Touch Cleaning & Maintenance, Inc. (“Personal Touch”) as Doe
1.
On June 7, 2022, the Court granted Personal
Touch’s ex parte application to continue trial in order to participate in
mediation. Pursuant to Personal Touch’s
request, trial was rescheduled to February 15, 2023. All discovery related deadlines were set to
the new trial date.
On January 9, 2023, the Court granted the
parties’ stipulation to continue trial in order to participate in mediation
scheduled for January 19, 2023. The
Court continued trial to September 26, 2023.
All discovery and motion related timeliness were set to the new trial
date.
On January 31, 2023, Personal Touch filed the
instant motion to continue the trial so that Personal Touch’s motion for
summary judgment may be heard on June 7, 2024.
The motion is unopposed.
Trial is currently scheduled for September 26,
2023.
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332, subdivision
(b) outlines that “a party seeking a continuance of the date set for trial,
whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must make the
request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex parte application under
the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting declarations. The party must make the motion or application
as soon as reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is
discovered.”
Under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332,
subd. (c), the Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing of
good cause requiring the continuance. Circumstances
that may indicate good cause include “a party's excused inability to obtain
essential testimony, documents, or other material evidence despite diligent
efforts.” The Court should consider all
facts and circumstances relevant to the determination, such as proximity of the
trial date, prior continuances, prejudice suffered, whether all parties have
stipulated to a continuance, and whether the interests of justice are
served. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1332, subd. (d).)
Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c requires a
Motion for Summary Judgment be made any time after 60 days have elapsed since
the general appearance in the action. The motion shall be heard no later than 30
days before trial, unless the Court, for good cause, orders otherwise. Parties must serve notice of the motion and
all supporting papers at least 75 days before the time appointed for hearing.
III.
DISCUSSION
Personal Touch seeks a trial continuance
because the January 19, 2023 mediation was unsuccessful and Personal Touch now intends
to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. Personal
Touch reserved the first available hearing date of June 7, 2024. (See Anvari Decl., ¶ 4.) Trial is currently scheduled for September 26,
2023. Personal Touch request a trial
continuance to accommodate the June 7, 2024 hearing for their Motion for
Summary Judgment.
Personal Touch has demonstrated good
cause to continue the trial. Personal
Touch reserved the June 7, 2024 date for their Motion for Summary Judgment,
which is the first available date. (Anvari
Decl., ¶ 4.) No opposition to this
motion has been filed.
IV.
CONCLUSION
The motion to continue trial is GRANTED.
Trial is continued from
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 28th day of March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|