Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 20STCV08034, Date: 2023-01-30 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV08034 Hearing Date: January 30, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
PAVLO
FILIPOV, Plaintiff(s), vs.
CJAN
EXPRESS; KENNETH YOUNG KIM, et al.,
Defendant(s), |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. January
30, 2023 |
I. INTRODUCTION
On
February 27, 2020, Plaintiff Pavlo Filipov (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendants Cjan Express, Inc. and Kenneth Yong Kim (collectively,
“Plaintiffs”).
On
May 25, 2022, Plaintiff substituted DOE 1 for Estate of Kenneth Yong Kim.
On December 26,
2022, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for leave to file a first amended
complaint (“FAC”) based on the passing of Defendant Kenneth Yong Kim. On
January 17, 2023, Defendants filed an opposition, but agree that the complaint
should be amended to add the Sun Young Kim as the administrator of Decedent. On January 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed their reply.
II. LEGAL
STANDARDS
CCP §473(a)(1) states: “The court may,
in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to
amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any
party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any
other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or
demurrer. The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the
adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any
pleading or proceeding in other particulars; and may upon like terms allow an
answer to be made after the time limited by this code.”
Judicial policy favors resolution of
all disputed matters between the parties and, therefore, the courts have held
that “there is a strong policy in favor of liberal allowance of amendments.” (Mesler v. Bragg Management Co. (1985) 39
Cal.3d 290, 296-97; see also Ventura v.
ABM Industries, Inc. (2013) 212 Cal.App.4th 258, 268) [“Trial courts are
bound to apply a policy of great liberality in permitting amendments to the
complaint at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial where the
adverse party will not be prejudiced.”].)
Pursuant to CRC 3.1324(a), a motion to
amend must: (1) include a copy of the proposed amendment or amended pleading,
which must be serially numbered; and (2) state what allegations are proposed to
be deleted from or added to the previous pleading and where such allegations
are located. CRC 3.1324(b) requires a
separate declaration that accompanies the motion, stating: (1) the effect of
the amendment; (2) why the amendment is necessary and proper; (3) when the
facts giving rise to the amended allegations were discovered; and (4) the
reason why the request for amendment was not made earlier.
III. DISCUSSION
The requests
for judicial notice are GRANTED. (Evid. Code §452.)
The Court finds the procedural
requirements of CRC 3.1324 have been met. Plaintiff seeks to amend his pleading
to add the administrator of deceased Kenneth Yong Kim’s estate. Defendants agree. A stipulation should have been reached in this
matter obviating this motion.
The motion is
GRANTED to amend the complaint to name Sun Young Kim as special administrator
of decedent’s estate.
IV. CONCLUSION
The motion is GRANTED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 30th day of January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|