Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 20STCV24733, Date: 2024-02-21 Tentative Ruling

Counsel may submit on the tentative ruling by emailing Dept. 31 before 8:30 the morning of the hearing. The email address is smcdept31@lacourt.org. Please do not call the court to submit on the tentative. Please do not submit to the tentative ruling on behalf of the opposing party. Please do not e-mail the Court if you plan to appear and argue.

In deciding whether to submit on the tentative ruling or attend the hearing and present oral argument, please keep the following in mind:

The tentative rulings authored by this court reflect that the court has read and considered all pleadings and evidence timely submitted to the court in connection with the motion, opposition, and reply (if any). Because the pleadings were filed, they are part of the public record.

Oral argument is not an opportunity to simply regurgitate that which a party set forth in its pleadings. Nor, is oral argument an opportunity to "make a record" when there is no court reporter present and the statements and arguments of counsel are already part of the record because they were set forth in the pleadings. Finally, simply because a party or attorney disagrees with the court's analysis and ruling or is not satisfied with it does not necessarily warrant oral argument when no new arguments will be articulated.

If you submit on the tentative, you must immediately notify all other parties email that you will not appear at the hearing. If you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the motions. If all parties to the motion submit, this tentative ruling will become the final ruling after the hearing date and it will be memorialized in a minute order. This tentative ruling is not an invitation, nor an opportunity, to file further documents relative to the hearing in question. No such document will be considered by the Court.

**Tentative rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment will only be available for review in the courtroom on the day of the hearing.



Case Number: 20STCV24733    Hearing Date: March 29, 2024    Dept: 31

Tentative Ruling

 

Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31

 

 

HEARING DATE:     March 29, 2024                      TRIAL DATE:  Disposed

                                                          

CASE:                                Hannah Park, As Trustee of the Gyoung Jae Park and Yoon Hee Choe Life Estate Trust, et al. v. Beverly OB & GYN Medical Center, Inc.

 

CASE NO.:                 20STCV24733

 

 

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

 

MOVING PARTY:                   Plaintiffs Hannah Park, as Trustee of the Gyoung Jae Park and Yoon Hee Choe Life Estate Trust, et al.

 

RESPONDING PARTY:     Defendant Beverly OB & GYN Medical Center, Inc.

 

 

 

            On June 30, 2020, Plaintiff, Plaintiffs Hannah Park and David park, as Trustees of the Gyoung Jae Park and Yoon Hee Choe Life Estate Trust, filed this declaratory relief action against Defendant, Beverly OB & GYN Medical Center, Inc.  On January 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC).

 

            On September 15, 2021, the court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.  Judgment was entered on October 4, 2021.

 

            On November 17, 2021, Defendant filed a Notice of Appeal.

 

            On July 25, 2023, the Court of Appeal issued a Remittitur affirming the judgment.

 

            On September 15, 2023, Plaintiffs filed this motion for attorney fees incurred from the appeal.  Defendants filed an opposition and Plaintiffs replied.

 

            On November 30, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the hearing for Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees. The basis for the stipulation was three-fold: (1) Plaintiffs have been sued by prior counsel for fees arising out of this instant matter including legal services rendered for the appeal; (2) Plaintiffs disputed the amount claimed and timely demanded arbitration, and (3) the result or resolution of that pending fee dispute may impact the award to be considered by this court.

            On February 21, 2024, the court continued the hearing for the motion to March 29, 2024 and directed the parties to notify the court of the status of arbitration no later than 5 court days before the hearing.

 

            On March 25, 2024, the parties filed a joint status report.  The report states that the related fee arbitration was continued to April 2, 2024.  As such, the parties agree to continue the hearing for this motion for another 45 days or as soon thereafter to allow the arbitrator to issue a written decision and findings.

 

            Accordingly, the hearing for Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees is CONTINUED to May 17, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. 

 

Moving party to give notice. 

 

 

Dated:   March 29, 2024                                            

 

 

 

 

  Kerry Bensinger

  Judge of the Superior Court