Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 20STCV38543, Date: 2023-02-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV38543 Hearing Date: February 14, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs.
NICOLE
GEORGE HANHAN, et al.,
Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENAS AND CONTINUE TRIAL
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
14, 2023 |
I.
INTRODUCTION
On October 6, 2020, plaintiff John
William Edwards II (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants Nicole
George Hanhan and Evon Hanhan (collectively “Defendants”) for injuries arising
from a motor vehicle accident.
On October 13, 2022, Defendants filed
the instant motion to compel non-parties Department of Veteran Affairs (the
“VA”), Juan Montes, M.D. (“Montes”), and Medi-Cal/California Department of
Health Care Services (“Medi-Cal”) (collectively the “Deponents”) to comply with
subpoenas for the production of Plaintiff’s medical records.
In addition, Defendants moved to
continue trial, and related dates. The
motion to continue trial is now moot, as the parties filed a joint stipulation,
and the Court entered an order, continuing trial and all related dates.
/ / /
/ / /
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
A “written notice and all moving papers
supporting a motion to compel an answer to a deposition question or to compel
production of a document or tangible thing from a nonparty deponent must be
personally served on the nonparty deponent unless the nonparty deponent agrees
to accept service by mail¿or electronic service¿at an address¿or electronic service address¿specified on the deposition record.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1346.)
III.
DISCUSSION
A review of the moving papers reveals
that Defendant failed to serve the Motion on Deponents. California Rules of Court, rule 3.1346
requires that the notice and moving papers be personally served on Deponents,
unless Deponents agreed to accept service by mail or at an electronic address. Here, there is no proof that the Motion was
served on Deponents.
Thus, the Court CONTINUES Defendant’s
Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas.
IV.
CONCLUSION
The Court CONTINUES Defendant’s Motion
to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas to allow Defendant to serve the motion on
Deponents. The hearing is continued to ______________________________. Prior to the hearing date, Defendant is to file
proofs of service.
As noted above, Defendant’s Motion to
Continue Trial is MOOT.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances
at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the
final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 14 day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|