Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 20STCV41794, Date: 2023-04-25 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV41794 Hearing Date: April 25, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs.
WAIL
BUSHARA, et al.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE:
MOTION
TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. April
25, 2023 |
I.
INTRODUCTION
On December 2, 2020, Plaintiff Deanna Linsmaier
filed this action against defendants Wail Bushara (“Bushara”) and Mercury
Insurance Company arising from a November 4, 2018 motor vehicle accident. Bushara was the driver of the vehicle in
which Plaintiff was a passenger.
On April 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to
continue the trial date. The Court
granted the motion. Pursuant to oral
stipulation, trial was rescheduled to December 8, 2022.
On October 5, 2022, the Court continued the trial
on its own motion so that Bushara’s motion to consolidate and to continue trial
could be heard on December 6, 2022. Trial
was continued to January 19, 2023.
On December 6, 2022, the Court granted
Defendant’s motion to consolidate and to
continue the trial. Trial was continued
to May 11, 2023.
On March 9, 2023, Bushara filed this motion to
continue the trial.
The motion is unopposed.
Trial is currently scheduled for May 11,
2023.
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332, subdivision
(b) outlines that “a party seeking a continuance of the date set for trial,
whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must make the
request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex parte application under
the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting declarations. The party must make the motion or application
as soon as reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is
discovered.”
Under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1332,
subd. (c), the Court may grant a continuance only on an affirmative showing of
good cause requiring the continuance. Circumstances
that may indicate good cause include “a party's excused inability to obtain
essential testimony, documents, or other material evidence despite diligent
efforts.” The Court should consider all
facts and circumstances relevant to the determination, such as proximity of the
trial date, prior continuances, prejudice suffered, whether all parties have
stipulated to a continuance, and whether the interests of justice are
served. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule
3.1332, subd. (d).)
Notwithstanding any other law and unless ordered
otherwise by a court or otherwise agreed to by the parties, a continuance or
postponement of a trial or arbitration date extends any deadlines
that have not already passed as of March 19, 2020, applicable to discovery,
including the exchange of expert witness information, mandatory settlement
conferences, and summary judgment motions in the same matter. The deadlines are
extended for the same length of time as the continuance or postponement of the
trial date. (Code Civ. Proc., § 599.)
III.
DISCUSSION
Bushara seeks a trial continuance to November
2023, or as soon thereafter, because he has encountered numerous obstacles in
obtaining Plaintiff’s employment records.
To date, the records have not been produced. Without the records, Bushara states that he
cannot evaluate Plaintiff’s claim for loss of earnings of $10,000,000. A motion to compel production of the records
is scheduled for June 21, 2023. Further,
Bushara has not been able to depose Plaintiff’s treating physician which
prevents evaluation of Plaintiff’s claimed injuries and treatment. (See Contreras Decl.)
Based on the foregoing, Bushara argues
good cause exists to continue the trial.
The Court agrees. Although this
is the third continuance in this matter, the case is not ready for trial. A trial continuance will allow Bushara to
complete discovery and to prepare for trial.
Further, the Court notes that this motion is unopposed.
IV.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the motion to continue
trial is GRANTED.
Trial is continued from
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 25th day of April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|