Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 21STCV03101, Date: 2023-02-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV03101 Hearing Date: February 28, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs.
GERARDO RANGEL,
et al.,
Defendant(s), |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
28, 2023 |
I. INTRODUCTION
On
January 26, 2021, Plaintiff Sophia Childs (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
against Defendants Gerardo Rangel, OCLA Express, OCLAEXPRESS.COM LLC, Jesus
Velasquez, and Perla Velasquez (“Defendants”) for damages arising from a motor
vehicle accident that occurred on February 1, 2019.
The
complaint alleges causes of action for (1) motor vehicle negligence; (2)
negligence per se; and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress.
On
January 24, 2023, Defendants filed the instant demurrer as to the second cause
of action for negligence per se.
No
opposition has been filed.
II. LEGAL
STANDARDS
A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency
of the pleadings and will be sustained only where the pleading is defective on
its face. (City of Atascadero v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith, Inc. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 445, 459.) “We treat the demurrer as admitting all
material facts properly pleaded but not contentions, deductions or conclusions
of fact or law. We accept the factual
allegations of the complaint as true and also consider matters which may be
judicially noticed. [Citation.]” (Mitchell v. California Department of Public
Health (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 1000, 1007; Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural
Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604 [“the facts alleged in the
pleading are deemed to be true, however improbable they may be”].) Allegations are to be liberally construed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 452.) A demurrer may be brought if insufficient
facts are stated to support the cause of action asserted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e).)
Leave to amend must be allowed where
there is a reasonable possibility of successful amendment. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d
335, 348.) The burden is on the
complainant to show the Court that a pleading can be amended successfully. (Ibid.)
III. DISCUSSION
Defendants demur to the second cause of
action arguing that negligence per se is an evidentiary presumption and not a
separate cause of action.
Negligence per se is not a separate
tort cause of action, but an evidentiary doctrine through which negligence may
be presumed if requirements are met. (Quiroz v. Seventh Ave. Center (2006)
140 Cal.App.4th 1256, 1285) “Accordingly, to apply negligence per se is not to
state an independent cause of action. The doctrine does not provide a private
right of action for violation of a statute. [Citation.] Instead, it operates to
establish a presumption of negligence for which the statute serves the
subsidiary function of providing evidence of an element of a preexisting common
law cause of action.” (Id at pp. 1285-86.)
To the extent that the Complaint
alleges negligence per se as a separate cause of action, the Court sustains the
demurrer without leave to amend. The allegations supporting the negligence per
se claim may remain in the Complaint to the extent that they support the
underlying negligence cause of action.
IV. CONCLUSION
Defendants’ demurrer to the second
cause of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 28th
day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|