Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 21STCV17132, Date: 2023-04-12 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV17132 Hearing Date: April 12, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
MARIA SANCHEZ GUTIERREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. ABDELAMIR ELHAGEHASSAN, Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
CASE NO.: 21STCV17132 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MINOR’S
COMPROMISE Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 12, 2023 |
On
March 15, 2023, Claimant, Alonso Sandoval, a minor, by and through his guardian
ad litem, Petitioner Maria Sanchez Gutierrez, has agreed to settle his claims
against Defendant Abdelamir Elhagehassan in exchange for a lump sum $93,334. If approved, $23,333.50 will be used for
attorney’s fees, leaving a balance of $70,000.50 for Claimant to be deposited
into a blocked account with Bank of America in Wilmington, CA, subject to
withdrawal only upon authorization of the court.
Court
approval is required for all settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code Civ. Proc. § 372.) The petition must be
verified and “must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any
bearing on the reasonableness of the compromise, covenant, settlement, or
disposition.” (Cal. Rules of Court rule 7.950.)
Regarding
attorney’s fees, the Court has reviewed the proposed settlement and finds that
the attorney’s fees requested are fair and reasonable. Claimant’s counsel
requests $23,333.50, which represents 25% of the present value of the
settlement, pursuant to the contingency fee agreement between the parties. (Declaration in Support of Petition,
Attachment 17(a), Ex. 1.) The Court
finds that $23,333.50 is justified.
Accordingly,
Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as
directed by the instructions provided on the court website at
www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that
if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the
opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the
matter. Unless you receive a submission
from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might
appear at the hearing to argue. If the
Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this
tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at
its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off
calendar.
Dated this 12th day of April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court |