Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 21STCV22981, Date: 2023-02-02 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV22981 Hearing Date: February 2, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs.
MAURICE
J WILLIAMS., et al.,
Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT MAURICE J. WILLIAMS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER
RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
2, 2023 |
On June 21,
2021, Plaintiff Josiah Winans filed this action against Defendants Maurice J.
Williams (“Williams”), Hao Huang (“Huang”), and Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) for
injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident, while Plaintiff was a passenger
in a vehicle operated by Huang.
On August 15,
2022, Williams (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) served Form
Interrogatories (Set One) (the “Interrogatories”) on Plaintiff. Plaintiff responded by serving unverified,
objection only, responses. Defendant met
and conferred with Plaintiff in an attempt to have Plaintiff provide further
responses, but that attempt was unsuccessful.
On November
14, 2022, Defendant filed the instant Motion to compel Defendant to provide
further responses to the Interrogatories.
No opposition
or reply have been filed.
Legal
Standard — Compel Further Responses
Under Code of Civil Procedure sections
2030.300, subdivision (a), and Section 2031.310, parties may move for a further
response to interrogatories or requests for production of documents where an
answer to the requests are evasive or incomplete or where an objection is
without merit or too general.
Notice of the motions must be given
within 45 days of service of the verified response, otherwise, the propounding
party waives any right to compel a further response. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2030.300, subd. (c); Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (c).) The motions must
also be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2030.300, subd. (b); Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd.
(b).)
Finally, Cal. Rules of Court, Rule
3.1345 requires that all motions or responses involving further discovery
contain a separate statement with the text of each request, the response, and a
statement of factual and legal reasons for compelling further responses. (Cal.
Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345, subd. (a)(3)).
Analysis
It is unclear whether the Motion was
timely made. While in the memorandum of
points and authorities Defendant represents that Plaintiff served response to
the Interrogatories on September 30, 2022, that representation is not included
in a declaration signed under penalty of perjury. In addition, Defendant failed to attach
Plaintiff’s responses to the Interrogatories, which would have included the
date that the responses were provided, and would have provided clarity on this
issue.
If the responses were served on
September 30, 2022, then the Motion is timely.
The 45-day time limit is mandatory and
jurisdictional.¿¿(Sexton v. Superior Court¿(1997) 58 Cal. App. 4th 1403, 1410.)
In light of the lack of clarity as to
whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the Motion, the Court CONTINUES
the Motion to allow Defendant to supplement the Motion to show that the
responses to the Interrogatories were served on September 30, 2022.
CONCLUSION
Defendant’s Motion to Compel
Plaintiff’s Further Responses is CONTINUED to __________________.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 2nd day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|