Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 21STCV33857, Date: 2023-08-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV33857 Hearing Date: August 28, 2023 Dept: 27
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 27
HEARING DATE: August
28, 2023 TRIAL
DATE: November 14, 2023
CASE: Pedram Panahi v. Hannah McCormack, et al.
CASE NO.: 21STCV33857
MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A CROSS-COMPLAINT
MOVING PARTY: Defendants
Anne McCormack and Hannah McCormack
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 14, 2021, Plaintiff, Pedram Panahi, initiated
this action against Defendants, Hannah McCormack and Anne McCormack, for injuries
arising from an October 11, 2019 motor vehicle accident.
On July 24, 2023, Defendants filed this motion seeking leave
to file a cross-complaint against proposed Cross-Defendants, Alejandro Barraza
Mendez and Contractors Plumbing & Fire, for contribution,[1]
indemnity, and declaratory relief.
The motion is unopposed.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
A party against whom a cause of action has been asserted in
a complaint or cross-complaint may file a cross-complaint asserting any cause
of action against a person alleged to be liable thereon, whether or not such
person is already a party to the action, if the cause of action asserted in the
cross-complaint arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions
or occurrences as the cause brought against him. (Code Civ. Proc. §
428.10, subd. (b)(1).)
A party shall file a cross-complaint against any of the
parties who filed the complaint or cross-complaint against him or her before or
at the same time as the answer to the complaint or cross-complaint. (Code
Civ. Proc. § 428.50, subd. (a).) Any other cross-complaint may be filed
at any time before the court has set a date for trial. (Code Civ. Proc. §
428.50, subd. (b).) A party shall obtain leave of court to file any
cross-complaint except one filed within the time specified in subdivision (a)
or (b). Leave may be granted in the interest of justice at any time
during the course of the action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 428.50, subd.
(c).) A party who fails to plead a cause of action, whether through
oversight, inadvertence, mistake, neglect, or other cause, may apply to the
court for leave to amend his pleading, or to file a cross-complaint, to assert
such cause at any time during the course of the action. The court, after
notice to the adverse party, shall grant, upon such terms as may be just to the
parties, leave to amend the pleading, or to file the cross-complaint, to assert
such cause if the party who failed to plead the cause acted in good
faith. (Code Civ. Proc. § 426.50.)
III. APPLICATION
Defendants argue leave should be granted to file a
cross-complaint because Plaintiff’s expert opines that proposed
Cross-Defendants caused Plaintiff’s injuries in a June 13, 2019 car accident. As such, Moving Defendants contend it is in
the interests of justice that leave be granted to file a cross-complaint.
Because the motion is unopposed, the Court finds no
prejudice will result if leave is granted to file a cross-complaint.
IV. CONCLUSION
The motion
for leave to file a cross-complaint is GRANTED.
Defendants, Hannah McCormack and Anne McCormack, are ordered to file the
attached proposed cross-complaint within 10 days of this order.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated: August 28, 2023 ___________________________________
Kerry
Bensinger
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on
the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at
www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative
and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless
appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive
emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and
there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
[1] Proposed cross-defendants are
defendants in the related case, Pedram Panahi v. Alejandro Barraza Mendez,
et al., which is also the lead case.