Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 21STCV44257, Date: 2023-01-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV44257 Hearing Date: January 20, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
HELENE
SPEARS, Plaintiff(s), vs.
Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE:
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. |
I.
INTRODUCTION
On December 3, 2021, plaintiff Helene Spears (“Plaintiff”) filed this motor vehicle negligence
action against defendants Park 'N Fly, LLC, BCD Parking, Inc., Park Holding,
Inc., and Edison Flowers (“Defendants”) based on an accident occurring on
December 4, 2019.
Trial is currently scheduled for June 2,
2024.
Defendants filed the instant motion for transfer,
coordination, and consolidation on December 21, 2022. The motion is opposed.
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
Code of Civil Procedure § 403 provides the
following:
A judge may, on motion, transfer an action or
actions from another court to that judge’s court for coordination with an
action involving a common question of fact or law within the meaning of Section
404. The motion shall be supported by a
declaration stating facts showing that the actions meet the standards specified
in Section 404.1, are not complex as defined by the Judicial Council and that
the moving party has made a good faith effort to obtain agreement to the
transfer from all parties to each action.
Notice of the motion shall be served on all parties to each action and
on each court in which an action is pending.
Any party to that action may file papers opposing the motion within the
time permitted by rule of the Judicial Council.
The court to which a case is transferred may order the cases
consolidated for trial pursuant to Section 1048 without any further motion or
hearing.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 403.)
LASC Local Rule 3.3(h) provides that “[a] civil
case which is not complex as defined by Standard 3.10 of the Standards of
Judicial Administration may be transferred to the court from a superior court
in another county, if it involves a common question of fact or law within the
meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 403.” (LASC Local Rule 3.3(h).)
Local Rule 3.3(h) further provides that “[c]oordination motions seeking to
transfer a case or cases to the Central District shall be filed and heard in
Department 1.” (Ibid.)
III.
DISCUSSION
Defendants seek to transfer and consolidate San
Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2133375 with this action.
Pursuant to LASC Local Rule 3.3(h), Plaintiff was required to file this motion
with Department 1.
Accordingly, the motion is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR.
IV.
CONCLUSION
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|