Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 22STCV11569, Date: 2023-08-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV11569 Hearing Date: August 29, 2023 Dept: 27
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 27
HEARING DATE: August
29, 2023 TRIAL
DATE: October 3, 2023
CASE: Lawrence Chao v. Ju Fat, LLC, et al.
CASE NO.: 22STCV11569
MOTIONS
TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff
Lawrence Chao
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
On August 1,
2023, Plaintiff, Lawrence Chao, filed these motions to compel Defendant, CRJ
Cafe, Inc. dba JJ Cafe, to provide responses to Form Interrogatories and
Request for Production of Documents. Plaintiff
seeks sanctions against Defendant and its counsel of record.
The motions
are procedurally deficient. Defendant is
represented by Brice K. Nakamura of Hess-Verdon & Associates. His email address on the Court’s electronic
case file is bnakamura@mylawpro.com
However, the proofs of service show different counsel was served with these
motions and discovery requests.
Specifically, Elaine Etingoff was served with the discovery requests at
eetingoff@mwl-law.com (Motions, Lee Decls., Exs. 2), and Neil C. Evans was
served with these motions at nevans@mwl-law.com.
Given these
circumstances, the Court cannot find Defendant was properly served with the
discovery requests or motions to compel. Further, as trial is scheduled for October 3,
2023, there is insufficient time for Plaintiff to re-serve the discovery
requests, and if necessary, to file motions to compel.
Accordingly,
the motions are DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated: August 29, 2023 ___________________________________
Kerry
Bensinger
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on
the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at
www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative
and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless
appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive
emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and
there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.